“…5(b). The optimal performance points occur at [5] drusen detection -, 23 Sens, Spec -> 96% except 1 image (88%) Brandon et al [2] drusen detection STARE,113 Sens -86%, Spec -93%, Acc -87% discrimination (size) STARE, 113 Acc -71% Mora et al [6] drusen detection -, 22 Sens -74%, Spec -94% discrimination (area) -, 22 Sens -63%, Spec -96% Smith et al [1] discrimination (area) -, 358 Sens -87.3%, Spec -95.3% Wong et al [11] drusen detection THALIA,350 Precision -95.46 ± 0.94 Kose et al [7] discrimination ( [12] drusen detection CAPT Sens -82%, Spec -75%, Acc -80% Barriga et al [8] HD/SD discrimination -, 5 Acc -96% for 120 patches (5 images) Proposed method drusen detection STARE, ARIA, 214 Sens -80%, Spec -90%; Sens -95%, Spec -70%,AUC -0.9257 HD/SD discrimination STARE, ARIA, 214 Sens -80%, Spec -92%; Sens -95%, Spec -70%, AUC -0.915 OP DET1 (sens−80%, spec−90%), OP DET2 (sens−95%, spec−70%) for drusen detection at the confidence score threshold value of 0.4, 0.25 and OP DISC1 (sens − 80%, spec − 92%), OP DISC1 (sens − 95%, spec − 70%) for HD and SD discrim- Table 1, our method gives good performance for drusen detection and discrimination.…”