2018
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2018.5220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi‐rate model predictive control algorithm for systems with fast‐slow dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower level is a dynamic MPC that operates on each individual system to guarantee that the process constraints are fulfilled, with a faster sampling time. For the dynamic control of the sub-system, specific controllers can be designed for the different operating modes: a linear MPC is implemented for normal production modes (see [5]; or [6] where multi-rate approach is adopted), while to address the nonlinearity of the system in the start-up phase, a linear parameter-varying MPC approach [5] is proposed for the optimization of a nonlinear system subjected to hard constraints. This method, exploiting the linearization of the system along the predicted trajec- tory, is able to address nonlinear system with the advantage of the computational time with respect to NMPC strategy, as an approximation of the SQP optimization stopped at the first iteration.…”
Section: Unit Commitment and Control Of Generation Unitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower level is a dynamic MPC that operates on each individual system to guarantee that the process constraints are fulfilled, with a faster sampling time. For the dynamic control of the sub-system, specific controllers can be designed for the different operating modes: a linear MPC is implemented for normal production modes (see [5]; or [6] where multi-rate approach is adopted), while to address the nonlinearity of the system in the start-up phase, a linear parameter-varying MPC approach [5] is proposed for the optimization of a nonlinear system subjected to hard constraints. This method, exploiting the linearization of the system along the predicted trajec- tory, is able to address nonlinear system with the advantage of the computational time with respect to NMPC strategy, as an approximation of the SQP optimization stopped at the first iteration.…”
Section: Unit Commitment and Control Of Generation Unitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This creates a major correlation/coupling between the decomposed subsystems sample rate and the super stepping operation [87][88][89]. Several research works compare system performance under fixed versus multi-rate control systems where the later offers higher degree of freedom that leads to enhance the system performance and decrease the settling time [89][90][91][92][93].…”
Section: Proposed Sf-based Mppt Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several research works compare system performance under fixed versus multi‐rate control systems where the later offers higher degree of freedom that leads to enhance the system performance and decrease the settling time [89–93].…”
Section: Proposed Mpp Tracing Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that, a similar problem has been addressed in [28], however the control scheme described in this paper shows a significant improvement for the following reasons: i) The algorithm in [28] is proposed for system described by impulse responses, with a special focus on the viewpoint of application, while this paper presents the novel solutions on the theoretical developments based on a state-space formulation, with verified closed-loop recursive feasibility and stability. ii) Due to the usage of impulse response representation, the concerned system in [28] is assumed to be strictly stable. In this case, for examples that have poles on the unitary disk, a stable feedback control law must be designed primarily (see the Section V).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%