2006
DOI: 10.1109/tr.2005.859227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Path Heuristic for Redundancy Allocation: The Tree Heuristic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Agarwal et al (2010) proposed a heuristic in which the solutions obtained are near-optimal in k-neighborhood ( k ⩾ 2). It is also applicable for separable and monotonic non-decreasing constraint functions and this algorithm performs better than those in Kohda and Inoue (1982), Shi (1987), Kim and Yum (1993), Agarwal and Aggarwal (2004, 2006) Ha and Kuo (2006) and Agarwal and Aggarwal (2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Agarwal et al (2010) proposed a heuristic in which the solutions obtained are near-optimal in k-neighborhood ( k ⩾ 2). It is also applicable for separable and monotonic non-decreasing constraint functions and this algorithm performs better than those in Kohda and Inoue (1982), Shi (1987), Kim and Yum (1993), Agarwal and Aggarwal (2004, 2006) Ha and Kuo (2006) and Agarwal and Aggarwal (2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decades, several deterministic methods have been used to solve the RRAP, such as the heuristic methods [9][10][11], the branch and bound method [12,13], the integer programming [14] and the dynamic programming method [15,16]. However, these methods have shown some weaknesses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently Ha and Kuo (2006) proposed a tree heuristic for solving the general redundancy allocation problem in reliability optimization. They have concluded that their algorithm outperforms that of Kim and Yum (1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm is tested for eight sets of problems (with linear constraints) each with ten randomly generated data and a five‐unit bridge structure with both, linear and nonlinear constraints. It is observed that there is much overall improvement in various measures of performance, namely, Average relative error A, Maximum relative error M, and Optimality rate O in comparison to the Agarwal and Aggarwal (2006, 2008) and Ha and Kuo (2006) algorithms. Besides, computational time is also reduced significantly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%