2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-01841-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-pass transmission electron microscopy

Abstract: Feynman once asked physicists to build better electron microscopes to be able to watch biology at work. While electron microscopes can now provide atomic resolution, electron beam induced specimen damage precludes high resolution imaging of sensitive materials, such as single proteins or polymers. Here, we use simulations to show that an electron microscope based on a multi-pass measurement protocol enables imaging of single proteins, without averaging structures over multiple images. While we demonstrate the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The need for only a single un-tilted image greatly simplifies acquisition and makes cHRTM compatible with pulsed-beam (Spence 2017) and multi-pass imaging techniques (Juffmann et al 2017;Koppell et al 2019), both designed to increase the amount of highresolution information extracted before it is lost to radiation damage. Together with improved detectors, this might well boost the sensitivity of cHRTM enough to make the majority of proteins detectable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need for only a single un-tilted image greatly simplifies acquisition and makes cHRTM compatible with pulsed-beam (Spence 2017) and multi-pass imaging techniques (Juffmann et al 2017;Koppell et al 2019), both designed to increase the amount of highresolution information extracted before it is lost to radiation damage. Together with improved detectors, this might well boost the sensitivity of cHRTM enough to make the majority of proteins detectable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This interferometric advantage is due to the coherent amplification of the intra-cavity field amplitudes that are transmitted and reflected by the sample in the CW case. Even in the limit of T 1 →1, we find that the linear sample response differs by a factor of two between the CW output field (13) and the first output pulse in (14). The CW advantage comes with the experimental difficulty of Figure 4.…”
Section: Cavity Rd Microscopymentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The glass plate induces an effective phase shift 2kd g between the left-and right-running components that not only shifts the cavity resonance, but also modulates the reflections at the sample layer, as seen explicitly in (14). In the pulsed imaging schemes discussed below, this will mainly affect the samplereflected pulses outcoupled after an even number of sample interactions, see (26).…”
Section: Cw Cavity Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations