2016
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1612.02437
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-partite entanglement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 163 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In physics literature one uses the term rank of a composite pure state, which is equal to the rank of the corresponding tensor T . Furthermore, to quantify entanglement of a multipartite state one uses the Schmidt measure [44,101], equal to the log of the rank of the corresponding tensor, E S (|ψ ) = log r(T ). More precise description of multipartite entanglement can be obtained by studying the spectral norm ||T || ∞ of a tensor, under the assumption that the Frobenius norm is fixed to unity, ||T ||…”
Section: Composite Systems and Quantum Entanglementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In physics literature one uses the term rank of a composite pure state, which is equal to the rank of the corresponding tensor T . Furthermore, to quantify entanglement of a multipartite state one uses the Schmidt measure [44,101], equal to the log of the rank of the corresponding tensor, E S (|ψ ) = log r(T ). More precise description of multipartite entanglement can be obtained by studying the spectral norm ||T || ∞ of a tensor, under the assumption that the Frobenius norm is fixed to unity, ||T ||…”
Section: Composite Systems and Quantum Entanglementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar way any pure state of a larger system consisting of d > 2 parties can be represented by a tensor T with d indices. However, description of entanglement in such a multipartite case is more difficult than for bipartite systems, as algebraic transformations on tensors are much more involved than the operations on matrices [101,9]. For instance, the notion of SVD was generalized for the space of tensors [64,36,75], but in general these decompositions do not bring T to the diagonal form.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our investigation focuses on establishing a protocol that uses quantum control operations combined with measurement and post-selection to produce highly entangled metrologically relevant states. We will refer to these states as Projected Squeezed states (see [10][11][12][13] for relevant discussions on measures of multipartite entanglement). We further study optimization of the control parameters that produce maximal overlap of the projected squeezed state with the well-known Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger state (commonly referred to as the maximally entangled state or GHZ state, see [10,14]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will refer to these states as Projected Squeezed states (see [10][11][12][13] for relevant discussions on measures of multipartite entanglement). We further study optimization of the control parameters that produce maximal overlap of the projected squeezed state with the well-known Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger state (commonly referred to as the maximally entangled state or GHZ state, see [10,14]). For a multipartite system consisting of N -qubits, the GHZ state reads as follows…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a nutshell and by oversimplifying, a multi-qubit state is said separable if it can be someway written as a tensor product of some subsystem states, and, hence, if it is not entangled. However, the concepts of separability and entanglement are quite complex, and we refer the reader to[47] for a proper formal definition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%