2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.137186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-output machine learning models for kinetic data evaluation : A Fischer–Tropsch synthesis case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, three ML models (Figure S9): back-propagation neural network (BPNN), 58 cascade forward neural network (CFNN), 59 and support vector regression (SVR) 47 are trained in Matlab 2022 and compared to select the most suitable model for establishing the relationship between t m and influencing parameters. The input parameters are N, Q, μ, R, and N S , and the output parameter is t m .…”
Section: Machine Learning (Ml) Models and Model Interpretabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this work, three ML models (Figure S9): back-propagation neural network (BPNN), 58 cascade forward neural network (CFNN), 59 and support vector regression (SVR) 47 are trained in Matlab 2022 and compared to select the most suitable model for establishing the relationship between t m and influencing parameters. The input parameters are N, Q, μ, R, and N S , and the output parameter is t m .…”
Section: Machine Learning (Ml) Models and Model Interpretabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, model-agnostic methods have been proposed to interpret the prediction results of ML models. Originated from the cooperative game theory, the SHAP (Shapley additive explanations) method is an effective model-agnostic method and has been widely adopted in ML model interpretability in the study of Fischer–Tropsch synthesis, separation, chemical absorption, porous carbon materials, etc. Model interpretability helps researchers screen out important factors in the research process and build trust in the prediction results of ML models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the random forest model and support vector machine model, the prediction accuracy of the DNN model is the highest, and the average R 2 of the optimized DNN model is higher than 0.90. Thybaut et al systematically compared the prediction results of MLmethods in Fischer–Tropsch reaction models 45 . The results show that the deep belief network (DBN) model is superior to other verifying indicators 45,46 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thybaut et al systematically compared the prediction results of MLmethods in Fischer–Tropsch reaction models 45 . The results show that the deep belief network (DBN) model is superior to other verifying indicators 45,46 . Furthermore, multiple linear regression, support vector machines, extreme gradient boosting (XGboost), and RF models have been employed to guide the optimization of product distribution and improve the yield of target products in the catalytic conversion process 47,48 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation