2022
DOI: 10.1111/acel.13578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi‐omic rejuvenation of naturally aged tissues by a single cycle of transient reprogramming

Abstract: The expression of the pluripotency factors OCT4, SOX2, KLF4, and MYC (OSKM) can convert somatic differentiated cells into pluripotent stem cells in a process known as reprogramming. Notably, partial and reversible reprogramming does not change cell identity but can reverse markers of aging in cells, improve the capacity of aged mice to repair tissue injuries, and extend longevity in progeroid mice. However, little is known about the mechanisms involved. Here, we have studied changes in the DNA methylome, trans… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
78
2
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
5
78
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using multi-omics approach and epigenetic clocks, MPTR has been found to rejuvenate several hallmarks of aging by reducing both transcriptional and epigenetic ages by 30 years and reverse age-associated changes without losing cell identity. These observations have been recently supported by in vivo transient reprogramming studies (Chondronasiou et al, 2022). Altogether, these findings demonstrate that pluripotency reprogramming and the rejuvenation program can be dissociated.…”
Section: Therapeutic Implicationssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Using multi-omics approach and epigenetic clocks, MPTR has been found to rejuvenate several hallmarks of aging by reducing both transcriptional and epigenetic ages by 30 years and reverse age-associated changes without losing cell identity. These observations have been recently supported by in vivo transient reprogramming studies (Chondronasiou et al, 2022). Altogether, these findings demonstrate that pluripotency reprogramming and the rejuvenation program can be dissociated.…”
Section: Therapeutic Implicationssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…More recently, there have been in vivo transient reprogramming approaches that elicit similar magnitudes of rejuvenation to our in vitro MPTR method. In mice, 1 week of reprogramming induction followed by 2 weeks of recovery reversed age-associated expression changes (including collagen gene expression) and partially rejuvenated the DNA methylome in the pancreas ( Chondronasiou et al, 2022 ). Interestingly, these outcomes closely mirror those observed in our human fibroblasts after MPTR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in order to avoid the adverse effects and early lethality associated with in vivo reprogramming, most studies have typically focused on the short-term expression of the reprogramming factors at organismal level, or more recently, the tissue- or organ-specific expression. In this line, to induce whole body expression of OSKM in the absence of side effects, researchers have commonly used short-term cyclic expression of the OSKM factors, such as 2 days (Browder et al, 2022; Ocampo et al, 2016) or 3 days (Rodriguez-Matellan et al, 2020) of doxycycline (1mg/ml) followed by 5 or 4 days withdrawal, or lower concentration of doxycycline (0.2 mg/ul) for 7 days (Chondronasiou et al, 2022). Alternatively, the generation of tissue-specific reprogrammable mouse models such as skeletal muscle-specific (Wang et al, 2021), heart-specific (Chen et al, 2021; de Lázaro et al, 2021) and liver-specific (Hishida et al, 2022), or the ectopic local expression of Yamanaka factors by using adeno-associated virus (Lu et al, 2020; Senis et al, 2018) have allowed to circumvent the negative consequences of organismal reprogramming.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this line, in vivo reprogramming can induce beneficial effects on skin (Doeser et al, 2018), heart (Chen et al, 2021), skeletal muscle (de Lazaro et al, 2019; Wang et al, 2021) and liver (Hishida et al, 2022) regeneration. Furthermore, reprogramming of aged mice has the capacity to improve memory (Rodriguez-Matellan et al, 2020), regenerate skeletal muscle and pancreas following injury (Chiche et al, 2017; Ocampo et al, 2016), restore vision loss in injured retina (Lu et al, 2020), and recently, rejuvenate multiple tissues and organs (Browder et al, 2022; Chondronasiou et al, 2022). Finally, cyclic induction of reprogramming has been shown to extend lifespan in a progeria mouse model (Alle et al, 2021; Ocampo et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%