2021
DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Omic Biomarkers as Potential Tools for the Characterisation of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions and Cancer: Innovative Patient Data Integration

Abstract: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is among the most aggressive types of cancer, having caused over 495,000 deaths worldwide in 2020, with increasing annual incidence. Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are protrusions found within or on the surface of the pancreas, and in many cases have the potential to become malignant. Current methods of characterising PCLs are imperfect and there is a profound need for improved diagnostic algorithms. This review highlights the importance of biological markers in the context of PCLs and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
(222 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, CA19-9 also gives false positive results in benign pancreaticobiliary diseases [ 14 , 15 ]. Several studies reported a number of non-invasive diagnostic and/or prognostic markers of pancreatic cancer that have been tested alone or in combination, such as: CA125, CEA, CEACAM1, MUC1, MIC1/GDF15, REG3A/PAP1, PKM2 and AXL, as well as auto-antibodies, fecal microbiome signatures and myeloid-derived suppressor cells [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ]. Yet, the clinical utility of these markers remains to be determined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, CA19-9 also gives false positive results in benign pancreaticobiliary diseases [ 14 , 15 ]. Several studies reported a number of non-invasive diagnostic and/or prognostic markers of pancreatic cancer that have been tested alone or in combination, such as: CA125, CEA, CEACAM1, MUC1, MIC1/GDF15, REG3A/PAP1, PKM2 and AXL, as well as auto-antibodies, fecal microbiome signatures and myeloid-derived suppressor cells [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ]. Yet, the clinical utility of these markers remains to be determined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In search of original biomarkers for PDAC, we started from the consideration that cell transformation by the KRAS oncogene generates protein dysregulation in the affected cells. It is well established that proteins secreted by cancer cells display several differences compared to normal counterparts, and secreted proteins may contribute to cancer-associated features [ 22 , 24 , 26 , 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparison, colorectal cancer-related protein-coding genes have little overlap with known cancer genes, this is one of the advantages of proteomics over other omics ( 29 , 56 ). It is logical therefore to examine this extensive information in parallel with the aim of revealing those attributes that can be considered robust and sensitive enough to work as a biomarker of patient risk ( 57 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other instances, gene expression is controlled by metabolites [82][83][84][85][86][87]. Metabolites are active participants in enzymatic reactions [88][89][90][91][92][93] and they control protein and cellular functions [94][95][96][97][98] so they are essential in comprehensively characterizing disease pathogenesis [99][100][101][102][103][104]. This review article focuses on the metabolomic profile of prostate cancer (PCa) and the current state of metabolomics-diverse omics integration in PCa research.…”
Section: Integration Of Metabolomics To Other Omic Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%