2023
DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1163529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-omic analyses in immune cell development with lessons learned from T cell development

Abstract: Traditionally, flow cytometry has been the preferred method to characterize immune cells at the single-cell level. Flow cytometry is used in immunology mostly to measure the expression of identifying markers on the cell surface, but—with good antibodies—can also be used to assess the expression of intracellular proteins. The advent of single-cell RNA-sequencing has paved the road to study immune development at an unprecedented resolution. Single-cell RNA-sequencing studies have not only allowed us to efficient… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 60 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this kind of RAG1 gene therapy showed good efficacy in the mouse models, the occurrence of leukaemia due to insertional mutagenesis, forced the field to move to SIN LV vectors ( 164 , 194 ). For some types of SCID, these vectors became quickly available, however for RAG1-SCID this proved to be a formidable challenge due to the high expression of RAG1 in very strictly defined lymphoid progenitor populations ( 195 , 196 ). We first reported successful LV preclinical work with the spleen focus-forming virus (SFFV) promotor, which was later replaced by the more clinically acceptable myeloproliferative sarcoma virus enhancer, negative control region deleted, dl587rev primer-binding site substituted (MND) promotor, which has been used before in clinical trials for gene therapy ( 109 , 112 , 197 ).…”
Section: Gene Therapy For Rag-scidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this kind of RAG1 gene therapy showed good efficacy in the mouse models, the occurrence of leukaemia due to insertional mutagenesis, forced the field to move to SIN LV vectors ( 164 , 194 ). For some types of SCID, these vectors became quickly available, however for RAG1-SCID this proved to be a formidable challenge due to the high expression of RAG1 in very strictly defined lymphoid progenitor populations ( 195 , 196 ). We first reported successful LV preclinical work with the spleen focus-forming virus (SFFV) promotor, which was later replaced by the more clinically acceptable myeloproliferative sarcoma virus enhancer, negative control region deleted, dl587rev primer-binding site substituted (MND) promotor, which has been used before in clinical trials for gene therapy ( 109 , 112 , 197 ).…”
Section: Gene Therapy For Rag-scidmentioning
confidence: 99%