2015
DOI: 10.3390/risks3030390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Objective Stochastic Optimization Programs for a Non-Life Insurance Company under Solvency Constraints

Abstract: In the paper, we introduce a multi-objective scenario-based optimization approach for chance-constrained portfolio selection problems. More specifically, a modified version of the normal constraint method is implemented with a global solver in order to generate a dotted approximation of the Pareto frontier for bi-and tri-objective programming problems. Numerical experiments are carried out on a set of portfolios to be optimized for an EU-based non-life insurance company. Both performance indicators and risk me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the strict complementarity condition is satisfied at (ȳ,d), gphN K is normally regular at (r(ȳ),d). Combining (17) and (18), we conclude that the equality (17) holds. Hence,…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the strict complementarity condition is satisfied at (ȳ,d), gphN K is normally regular at (r(ȳ),d). Combining (17) and (18), we conclude that the equality (17) holds. Hence,…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This is a typical practical example. Other familiar practical examples are given in [2], [3], [4], [12], [18], [30] etc. In recent years stochastic multiobjective programs with equilibrium constraints play a nonnegligible role in mathematical programmings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Median model [12] refers to in the condition of a set of demand with given number and location and a candidate facility location set, find the appropriate location for p facilities and assign each demand point to a specific facility, in order to achieve the lowest transportation cost between the factory and the demand point. The object function is given by (10) Constraints are given by (11) where N denotes the ... n costumer (demand point) in the research object, M denotes ... m candidate point in the research object, d l denotes the demand of the l-th point, c lj denotes unit transportation cost from location l to j , p is the number of facility points allowed to be built, A(j ) is the set of demand points covered by the facility point j , and B(l) is the set of facility point j covering the demand point l.…”
Section: ) Maximum Covering Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the three problems include a portfolio performance constraint defined as a lower bound on the expected return on capital (ROC). Kaucic & Daris (2015) proposed an alternative approach to deal with multi-objective portfolio optimization problems with chance constraints and applied this optimization framework to an EU-based non-life insurance company that tries to minimize the risk of the discrepancy between assets and liabilities. The authors adopt shareholders' capital and investment weights as decision variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%