The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2008.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective simulation-optimization for earthmoving operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…neither a precise performance nor a probability distribution can be specified in MAUT. Zhang (2008) proposed a framework of multi-objective simulation optimization for optimizing equipment-configurations of earthmoving operations by integrating an activity object-oriented simulation, MAUT, a statistical approach like the two-stage ranking and selection procedure and particle swarm optimization algorithm. The MAUT was applied to evaluate the performances generated through simulation by considering multiple criteria and the preference of decision-makers.…”
Section: Multiple Attribute Utility Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…neither a precise performance nor a probability distribution can be specified in MAUT. Zhang (2008) proposed a framework of multi-objective simulation optimization for optimizing equipment-configurations of earthmoving operations by integrating an activity object-oriented simulation, MAUT, a statistical approach like the two-stage ranking and selection procedure and particle swarm optimization algorithm. The MAUT was applied to evaluate the performances generated through simulation by considering multiple criteria and the preference of decision-makers.…”
Section: Multiple Attribute Utility Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coupling rough sets, metamodels and ranking and selection may result in a highly effective approach for dealing with expensive and noisy objective functions. Also, given that rough sets have been shown to be effective in multiobjective optimization (see Hernández-Díaz et al 2006, 2008, another promising research avenue is the development of a SS/rough-sets for multiobjective simulation optimization, an area that has generated a fair amount of interest in engineering and science (Lee et al 1996;Mebarki and Castagna 2000;Yang and Chou 2005;Pasandideh and Niaki 2006;Rosen et al 2007Rosen et al , 2008Teng et al 2007;Zhang 2008;Willis and Jones 2008).…”
Section: Promising Areas For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main objectives of the optimization were to minimize time and cost of earthmoving operations, taking in consideration equipment availability, project indirect cost, and a group of qualitative and quantitative variables that influence the productivity of earthmoving operations. Zhang (2008) presented a framework that integrates simulation with multi-objective optimization for earthmoving operations. It utilizes par-ticle swarm optimization to select best equipment-configurations through earthmoving operations simulation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%