2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2011.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective robust PID controller tuning using two lbests multi-objective particle swarm optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, instead of time-domain properties the integral of the absolute value of the derivative the control signal and integral of the absolute value of the error is considered as objectives. This idea is applied to twin rotor MIMO system (as a PI controller tuning algorithm similar study evaluated on [7] and for aircraft in [8]) and results also support the better performance of the multiobjective tuning methodology. Also in [9], two similar objectives which are integral time absolute error and control effort is taken to tune PID controller for the plastic injection molding process, and in [10] same objectives are evaluated on weighted sum scalarization function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…However, instead of time-domain properties the integral of the absolute value of the derivative the control signal and integral of the absolute value of the error is considered as objectives. This idea is applied to twin rotor MIMO system (as a PI controller tuning algorithm similar study evaluated on [7] and for aircraft in [8]) and results also support the better performance of the multiobjective tuning methodology. Also in [9], two similar objectives which are integral time absolute error and control effort is taken to tune PID controller for the plastic injection molding process, and in [10] same objectives are evaluated on weighted sum scalarization function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Conventional methods like Ziegler Nichols and Cohen -Coon methods failed to produce robust controller designs with guaranteed robustness degree. Hence stability of the control system gets affected [31].…”
Section: Robustness With Respect To Model Uncertainties and Disturbanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional methods like Ziegler Nichols and Cohen -Coon methods failed to produce robust controller designs with guaranteed robustness degree. Hence stability of the control system gets affected [31].where J 1 = robustness with respect to model uncertainties and disturbance attenuation J a = model uncertainty in ∞ H normsubjected to the constraints in eqns. (4) and (5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this challenge, tuning of decentralized PI/PID controller by using intelligent optimization techniques such as PSO and GA [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19] and [20] are used due to their less complexity, high performance and easy implementation. Genetic algorithms (GAs) belong to the larger class of evolutionary algorithms, which generate solutions to optimization problems using techniques inspired by natural evolution, such as inheritance, mutation, selection, and crossover [21].…”
Section: Controlling Of Chemical Processes (Which Are Basically Multimentioning
confidence: 99%