2021
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2021.3068855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Objective Resource Allocation for D2D and Enabled MC-NOMA Networks by Tchebycheff Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we resort to the Tchebycheff method to transform the MOOP into two single-objective optimization problems (SOOPs) instead of the widely used Dinklebach method [26]. This method can yield a complete Pareto optimal set [27], [28] compared to other approaches, such as -method, weighted product method, and exponentially weighted criterion [29]. • We exploit alternating optimization (AO) to split the first SOOP (throughput maximization) into two sub-problems.…”
Section: B Our Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, we resort to the Tchebycheff method to transform the MOOP into two single-objective optimization problems (SOOPs) instead of the widely used Dinklebach method [26]. This method can yield a complete Pareto optimal set [27], [28] compared to other approaches, such as -method, weighted product method, and exponentially weighted criterion [29]. • We exploit alternating optimization (AO) to split the first SOOP (throughput maximization) into two sub-problems.…”
Section: B Our Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The boundary achieved by all feasible points from the Pareto optimal set is called the Pareto optimal front (PF). Here, we adopt the weighted Tchebycheff method, which can yield the PF, even if the MOOP is nonconvex [27], [28]. It minimizes the maximum deviations of the objective values from their utopia values; e.g., one solves…”
Section: Equivalent Optimization Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, in the existing MOOP frameworks in D2D communications underlying cellular networks such as refs. [17] and [18], the authors did not consider the impact of the IRS in D2D communication underlying cellular networks. In fact, since IRSs can be configured to effectively eliminate D2D interference and enhance desired signals, incorporating them into the existing MOOP framework in D2D communications can further increase spectral efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A MOOP trade‐off between the D2D pairs and the CUs in D2D underlying non‐orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) cellular networks was studied in ref. [18] to maximize the sum rate of the D2D pairs and CUs simultaneously. This problem was first converted into a SOOP via the weighted Tchebycheff method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation