2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11431-012-5038-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective optimization of the streamlined head of high-speed trains based on the Kriging model

Abstract: As the running speed of high-speed trains increases, aerodynamic drag becomes the key factor which limits the further increase of the running speed and energy consumption. Aerodynamic lift of the trailing car also becomes the key force which affects the amenity and safety of the train. In the present paper, a simplified CRH380A high-speed train with three carriages is chosen as the model in order to optimize aerodynamic drag of the total train and aerodynamic lift of the trailing car. A constrained multi-objec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…al. [11] optimized the streamline of the head of CRH380A by using Kriging method, CFD analysis, and multi-objective optimization method. Table 1 shows the result of the force coefficient of the optimized shape and original shape.…”
Section: Aerodynamics Of Train Nosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. [11] optimized the streamline of the head of CRH380A by using Kriging method, CFD analysis, and multi-objective optimization method. Table 1 shows the result of the force coefficient of the optimized shape and original shape.…”
Section: Aerodynamics Of Train Nosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The division of the spatial grid directly affects the accuracy and stability of the results of the calculation (Yao et al, 2012). In order to assess the effect of various spatial grid divisions on the results of the numerical calculation, three different sets of grids are used to verify.…”
Section: Verification Of the Cfd Codementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grid-independent validation was performed using different numbers of hexahedral meshes combined to form a prism mesh near the surface of the train, with a more highly refined mesh in the wake regions of the tail train and the pantograph to assess the influence of different spatial meshes on the calculation results. With the thickness of the first prism layer defined to satisfy the requirement of the wall function [32], three meshes configurations were considered in the present study. The parameters of the three mesh configurations and the corresponding computational results are listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Grid-independent Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%