Multi-objective optimization of sustainable single-effect water/Lithium Bromide absorption cycle

Abstract

A rigorous mathematical approach is developed for optimization of sustainable single-effect water/Lithium Bromide (LiBr) absorption cooling cycles. The multi-objective formulation accounts for minimization of the chiller area as well as the environmental impact associated with the operation of the absorption cycle. The environmental impact is quantified based on the global warming potential and the Eco-indicator 99, both of which follow principles of life cycle assessment. The design task is formulated as a bi-criterion non-linear programming problem, the solution of which is defined by a set of Pareto points that represent the optimal compromise between the total area of the chiller and global warming potential. These Pareto sets are obtained via the epsilon constraint method. A set of design alternatives are provided for the absorption cycles rather than a single design; the best design can be chosen from this set based on the major constraints and benefits in a given application. The proposed approach is illustrated design of a typical absorption cooling cycle.

Multi-objective optimization of thermal modelled cubicles considering the total cost and life cycle environmental impact

“…As mentioned previously, the model seeks to minimize the total cost. The total cost ( methodology [12,58] which is based on LCA principles and which has already been use by other authors in similar case studies [14,[59][60][61]. LCA is a method for evaluating the environmental impacts of products by adopting an holistic approach that accounts for the direct and indirect impacts.…”

Systematic approach for the life cycle multi-objective optimization of buildings combining objective reduction and surrogate modeling

“…economic cost and environmental impact). This mathematical approach is widely employed in many areas of science and engineering for studying trade-off solutions and for optimizing several objective functions simultaneously [15][16][17][18]. Unfortunately, MOO is rather sensitive to the number of objectives considered in the analysis, mainly because both the calculation of the Pareto solutions and their visualization and analysis become more complex as we increase the number of criteria.…”

Thermodynamic Evaluation of LiCl-H2O and LiBr-H2O Absorption Refrigeration Systems Based on a Novel Model and Algorithm

“…In the above formula, the logarithmic mean temperature difference can be calculated conveniently with high-precision by employing Chen's approximation [35,36], which is described as a function of temperature differences between the hot and cold end, as shown in the following equation:…”