Volume 2: Reliability, Availability and Maintainability (RAM); Plant Systems, Structures, Components and Materials Issues; Simp 2013
DOI: 10.1115/power2013-98149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Objective Optimization of Runner Blades Using a Multi-Fidelity Algorithm

Abstract: A robust multi-fidelity design optimization methodology has been developed to integrate advantages of high- and low-fidelity analyses and alleviate their weaknesses. The aim of this methodology is to reach more efficient turbine runners with respect to different constraints, in reasonable computational time and cost. In such a framework, an inexpensive low-fidelity (inviscid) solver handles most of the computational burden by providing data for the optimizer to evaluate objective functions and constraint value… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 5 shows the optimization flowchart, which is described in the following subsections. The multi-level optimization methodology and its formulation have been presented in previous publications (Bahrami et al 2013(Bahrami et al , 2016.…”
Section: Test Case 1: Hydraulic Turbine Runner Bladesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 5 shows the optimization flowchart, which is described in the following subsections. The multi-level optimization methodology and its formulation have been presented in previous publications (Bahrami et al 2013(Bahrami et al , 2016.…”
Section: Test Case 1: Hydraulic Turbine Runner Bladesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, we presented the results of a bi-objective low-fidelity optimization employed in the developed multi-fidelity methodology [17]. Also, EASY has demonstrated its success to handle a multi-objective Francis runner optimization problem [14].…”
Section: Optimization Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if there was a significant deviation from the targeted peak position, the operating condition used in the low-fidelity optimization constraints should be corrected in the next optimization step. We applied two linear corrections previously in optimizing a medium high-head Francis runner within three optimization overall loops [17]. Also, off-design operating points can be considered by adding new constraints and/or objectives dedicated to those operating conditions such as [21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%