2013, 7th International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication Systems (ICSPCS) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icspcs.2013.6723994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective Optimization (MOO) approach for sensor node placement in WSN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The size of the region is 100 *100 m 2 . The predefined values of sensing and the transmission ranges are (5,10,15,20) and (10,20,30,40) respectively. The genetic parameters are considered as follow:…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The size of the region is 100 *100 m 2 . The predefined values of sensing and the transmission ranges are (5,10,15,20) and (10,20,30,40) respectively. The genetic parameters are considered as follow:…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this algorithm, periodic sending of broadcast messages, and listening for the reply messages are required, so increases the number of message exchanges between the nodes and the network lifetime will be decreased. Author of [15] proposed a multi-objective optimization approach for optimizing the energy consumption and coverage in WSNs. In [16], the sensing ranges of sensor nodes are adjustable and the impact of this adjustment on coverage is studied.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coverage and lifetime of the sensor network have been jointly optimized in [ 86 ] by using a multi-objective optimization algorithm based on memetic algorithm. The sensor node deployment problem has been considered in [ 145 ] to jointly optimize the two objectives namely, maximum coverage and minimum energy consumption. Coverage, delay and energy consumption are optimized by using multi-objective optimization algorithm in [ 151 ].…”
Section: Relationship Between Different Desirable Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this subsection, we review some of the work using bio-inspired algorithms to solve the multi-objective optimization formulations in order to address different issues relating to wireless sensor networks. The sensor node placement problem has been modeled as a multi-objective optimization problem in [ 145 ], where authors have used a bio-inspired algorithm to maximize the coverage and minimize the energy consumption. A bio-inspired based algorithm has been used to solve a multi-objective optimization problem in [ 93 ] by finding the optimal transmission range in order to avoid energy hole problem in wireless sensor networks and to maximize the life time of the network.…”
Section: Solution Types/algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A flexible algorithm presented in [25] uses an evolutionary computational approach to optimize connectivity and energy cost of WSNs in addition to coverage. The problem of positioning sensor nodes in WSN considering coverage with minimum energy consumption is studied in [26] and a multiobjective optimization approach is proposed for optimizing the energy consumption and coverage. The research presented in [27] used the characteristics of Voronoi diagram and direction-adjustable directional sensors and proposed a distributed greedy algorithm, which can improve the effective field coverage of directional sensor networks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%