Handbook of Materials Modeling 2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-44680-6_71
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective Optimization as a Tool for Material Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The database contains the crystal structure information for 1591 binary and 80 unary systems, which includes all elements except noble gases (Ar, Xe, Rn), lanthanoids from Ce to Lu, and all short-lived elements heavier than Bk. Of these, only 446 systems have the magnetic information obtained from several multiobjective evolutionary searches for low-energy and highly magnetized phases, as implemented in the USPEX algorithm . The hardness of all crystal structures in this database was initially computed using the Lyakhov–Oganov model .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The database contains the crystal structure information for 1591 binary and 80 unary systems, which includes all elements except noble gases (Ar, Xe, Rn), lanthanoids from Ce to Lu, and all short-lived elements heavier than Bk. Of these, only 446 systems have the magnetic information obtained from several multiobjective evolutionary searches for low-energy and highly magnetized phases, as implemented in the USPEX algorithm . The hardness of all crystal structures in this database was initially computed using the Lyakhov–Oganov model .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, only 446 systems have the magnetic information obtained from several multiobjective evolutionary searches for low-energy and highly magnetized phases, as implemented in the USPEX algorithm. 15 The hardness of all crystal structures in this database was initially computed using the Lyakhov−Oganov model. 16 The database is fully consistent because all crystal structures were relaxed and their energies computed with the same settings using density functional theory with the projector-augmented wave method (PAW) and PBE 17 functional as implemented in the VASP code.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is the nature of the chemical scale (or the Mendeleev number, which is an integer showing of the sequence of elements on the chemical scale)? Pettifor derived these quantities empirically, while we redefined them 12 using a non-empirical (thus, more universal) way, which clarifies their physical meaning. In redefining these quantities, we used the most important chemical properties of an atom (size R and electronegativity χ) in which the combination of these properties can be used as a single parameter succinctly characterizing chemistry of the element.…”
Section: Mendelevian Spacementioning
confidence: 95%
“…The fitness of a generated structure generally reflects on the energy and its evolution. Recent advances in the USPEX code lets users specify additional properties to include within the fitness parameter which allows multiple parameters to be optimized simultaneously [82]. Examples of such parameters are volume, hardness, elasticity properties, bandgap, density, and structural order.…”
Section: Crystal Structure Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%