2017 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/vppc.2017.8331015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Objective Optimisation of the Management of Electric Bus Fleet Charging

Abstract: Abstract-The paper introduces a methodical approach which can be used to identify the optimum charging strategy for a fleet of electrical-powered buses. The methodical approach allows minimizing the energy consumption, the peak load demand and ageing of the batteries. This method uses optimisation algorithms to search for optimal plans taking into account technical constraints.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
11
1
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The present paper differs from the referred ones [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] as it investigates more precisely the battery electro-thermal and aging behavior in order to minimize the battery aging cost. This work differs also from our previous results [26,27] that dealt with the reduction of the charging cost applied to a multi-objective small-scale EBs fleet and a mono-objective large-scale EBs fleet. The present study includes a large-scale EBs fleet with a possible extension of the proposed algorithm to hundreds of buses while using a mono-objective nonlinear programming optimization to minimize battery aging and requiring relatively short calculation time.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present paper differs from the referred ones [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] as it investigates more precisely the battery electro-thermal and aging behavior in order to minimize the battery aging cost. This work differs also from our previous results [26,27] that dealt with the reduction of the charging cost applied to a multi-objective small-scale EBs fleet and a mono-objective large-scale EBs fleet. The present study includes a large-scale EBs fleet with a possible extension of the proposed algorithm to hundreds of buses while using a mono-objective nonlinear programming optimization to minimize battery aging and requiring relatively short calculation time.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…As mentioned in Section 5.1, the optimal charging power Table 2 presents the CPU (Central Processing Unit) time for the charging optimization of different EBs fleet sizes over a period of 1 day. The NLP programming was compared with non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) used in a previous work [26]. From a bus fleet larger than 10 EBs and more, NSGA-II does not converge.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed algorithm has the objective to minimize the operational costs as well as to determine the amount of electrical buses necessary to replace hybrid buses. Houbbadi et al focus on multiobjective evolutionary algorithms for management of electric bus fleet charging [20]. The authors propose an optimal charging schedule with the goal to reduce the charging costs and battery ageing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we investigate more precisely the battery electro-thermal and aging behavior of a large-scale EBs fleet while handling a multi-objective optimization problem. In our previous work [12], NSGA-II method has been tested with success for sloving multiobjective problem. The main drawback was the processing time and the possibility of considering only a weak number of buses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimization takes place during the overnight charging. We present and discuss our results in Section V. The results of the optimization problem will be compared to the previous NSGA-II algorithm taken as a reference for a small number of buses [12]. Finally, Section VI draws some conclusions and introduces future work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%