2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective optimisation of stent dilation strategy in a patient-specific coronary artery via computational and surrogate modelling

Abstract: Multi-objective optimisation of stent dilation strategy in a patient-specific coronary artery via computational and surrogate modeling This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting galley proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be disc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If this also fails, the current simulation case is closed, and a fresh start is made from the base case simulation. The sampling plan and associated output generated by the process simulation is used to train a Kriging model [23][24][25] using the pyKriging package [16,26,27]. See also [22,28,29] for more information about Kriging in chemical engineering applications.…”
Section: Sampling and Surrogate Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this also fails, the current simulation case is closed, and a fresh start is made from the base case simulation. The sampling plan and associated output generated by the process simulation is used to train a Kriging model [23][24][25] using the pyKriging package [16,26,27]. See also [22,28,29] for more information about Kriging in chemical engineering applications.…”
Section: Sampling and Surrogate Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are substantial barriers to clinical implementation of these techniques including difficulty in obtaining imaging data, lengthy solver times for the models and the need for a trained user to develop and interpret the FE model (Dickinson et al 2017 ). Further, despite the first FE model of a lower limb amputee being published in 1988 (Reynolds 1988 ), research in this field has not advanced at the rate of many implanted prosthetic devices where tools to simulate the variation in performance across a population are well established (Bryan et al 2010 ; Taylor and Prendergast 2015 ; Ragkousis et al 2016 ) or in the prediction of sub-dermal soft tissue strains during seating (Al-Dirini et al 2016 ; Luboz et al 2017 ). This provides the motivation and objective for the present study, which aimed to develop a surrogate model to allow equivalent predictions to single FEA solutions, across a broad population of anatomical, surgical and design variability, with sufficiently reduced computational expense for clinical use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reproducible experimental conditions exclude technical impairments that might cause different vessel injuries: Vessel dimensions (D Mean , D Prox , D Dist ) used in both study groups were comparable. Our SI procedure prevented differences in overstretching injury [24]. Vessel fixation with the small weight has the same influence on all investigated stents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%