2017
DOI: 10.1002/stc.2008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective optimal design of tuned mass dampers

Abstract: This paper first presents a multi‐objective optimization problem formulation for the design of a tuned mass damper (TMD) for either a base excitation or an external load. The optimization seeks to simultaneously minimize structural responses, the TMD mass and the TMD stroke. A white noise input is adopted to represent the base acceleration or the external load. Alternatively, a filtered white noise could be used. Furthermore, the TMD is assumed to be tuned to dampen one of the modes of the structure, typically… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classic dynamic equilibrium equation shown in equation 3is re-written in modal coordinates rather than classic cartesian ones, using matrix transformation. Further details on this procedure may be found in [11]. The resulting problem is then separated into independent problems for each one of the 76 vibration modes, and solved for all 20 wind load time histories by the linear Newmark's Method [37].…”
Section: Wind Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The classic dynamic equilibrium equation shown in equation 3is re-written in modal coordinates rather than classic cartesian ones, using matrix transformation. Further details on this procedure may be found in [11]. The resulting problem is then separated into independent problems for each one of the 76 vibration modes, and solved for all 20 wind load time histories by the linear Newmark's Method [37].…”
Section: Wind Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TMD optimization in SDOF systems was investigated using distinct methods such as numeric searching techniques [6], [7] and evolutionary algorithms [8]. Other researchers studied optimization of TMDs connected to multiple-degree-of-freedom (MDOF) systems employing evolutionary algorithms such as Genetic Algorithm (GA) [9], Differential Evolution (DE) [10], and gradient-based techniques [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the LCC of low‐rise office buildings in highly seismic regions, Taflanidis and Beck show that the relative contribution of acceleration‐sensitive contents to the overall lifetime damage cost is practically negligible. Optimizing a single TMD on a 10‐storey linear building structure, Lavan confirms that displacements and accelerations are substantially not competing objectives in TMD optimal design. Not specifically accounting for acceleration‐related damage, the LCC formulation herein adopted may lead to a certain underestimation of damage cost especially in the case of tall buildings, for which the relative significance of accelerations with respect to interstorey drift ratios increases.…”
Section: Lifecylce Cost‐optimal Seismic Design Of Tuned Mass Dampers mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, researchers also extended it into the community of earthquake engineering in the past years. Some optimum TMD parameters and optimization algorithms have been derived under various types of ground excitations, part of which considered the uncertainties resulted from the changing environment . However, the seismic response mitigation of conventional TMDs had not been effective because the TMD had little effect on the maximum responses under earthquakes .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some optimum TMD parameters and optimization algorithms have been derived under various types of ground excitations, [10][11][12] part of which considered the uncertainties resulted from the changing environment. [13][14][15][16][17][18] However, the seismic response mitigation of conventional TMDs had not been effective because the TMD had little effect on the maximum responses under earthquakes. 19 Additionally, a considerable mass of TMD was required to achieve a sizeable reduction in the response, especially for structures with large damping ratios, 6 which in turn compromised the applicability of TMDs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%