2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective model for supplier selection and order allocation problem with fuzzy parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the noise resistance of the algorithm is improved, the actual edge area will be weakened, resulting in edge missing detection. In both cases, the detected edge will deviate from the actual edge, resulting in unreasonable segmentation results [3][4][5].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the noise resistance of the algorithm is improved, the actual edge area will be weakened, resulting in edge missing detection. In both cases, the detected edge will deviate from the actual edge, resulting in unreasonable segmentation results [3][4][5].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goren [56] developed the MILP model consisting of cost and value of purchasing as objectives for sustainable distribution of orders to the suppliers. Furthermore, to incorporate the aspect of uncertainty in input parameters, researchers shifted from conventional MILP/MINLP to fuzzified MILP/MINLP, see for instance, [37,[57][58][59][60]. Various solution approaches have been used to solve the mathematical models developed for order allocation.…”
Section: Orji Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firouzi and Jadidi [64] proposed a fuzzy MODM model for the SSOA problem that could manage the uncertainties brought about by disasters in Japan. The researchers acknowledged that such catastrophes could have unfavorable effects on businesses and markets, resulting in increased demand for certain goods or a reduction in the suppliers' ability to provide them in the appropriate quantity, quality, and time.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%