2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-40627-0_46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Objective Large Neighborhood Search

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This constraint reduces the domain of a variable Obj i if the domains of the other variables enter into the dominated zone of a solution in A. A detailed description of this constraint as well as an extension with Large Neighborhood Search is proposed in [52]. This constraint Pareto can be introduced in our model.…”
Section: Sincementioning
confidence: 95%
“…This constraint reduces the domain of a variable Obj i if the domains of the other variables enter into the dominated zone of a solution in A. A detailed description of this constraint as well as an extension with Large Neighborhood Search is proposed in [52]. This constraint Pareto can be introduced in our model.…”
Section: Sincementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Our DSL also permits to define other delay-respectful goals, e.g., with delay constraints expressed as a percentage of their current values or delays for given demands in the objective function. DEFO also supports multi-objective goals [17]. The next snippet shows a goal in which both the maximum link load and the average latency have to be optimized.…”
Section: Expressing Network Goalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6] describes a more dynamic CP approach to compute Pareto front: the idea is to search for all solutions, and dynamically add a constraint each time a new solution is found to prevent the search from computing solutions that are dominated by it. This idea has been improved in [22,10]. We have experimentally compared these two approaches, and found that the dynamic approach of [6] is more efficient than the static approach of [3] for our problem.…”
Section: Computation Of Extrema Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%