2017
DOI: 10.15866/ireaco.v10i1.11143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm Optimization Using PID Controller for AQM/TCP Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it can be shown that the ACO technic based on Pareto efficiency provides satisfactory results compared to the solutions given by GA and ZN methods used in previous research works (Chebli & Akkary, 2016;Chebli et al, 2017a) Table 2 and Figure 6 summarize this comparison. We took only one solution for each performance index since all the solutions are equivalent given that they belong to the Pareto surface, we chose the solutions which offer the smallest settling time and rise time.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, it can be shown that the ACO technic based on Pareto efficiency provides satisfactory results compared to the solutions given by GA and ZN methods used in previous research works (Chebli & Akkary, 2016;Chebli et al, 2017a) Table 2 and Figure 6 summarize this comparison. We took only one solution for each performance index since all the solutions are equivalent given that they belong to the Pareto surface, we chose the solutions which offer the smallest settling time and rise time.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 60%
“…It has been opted for this method to be compared with for its simplicity and efficiency (Åström & Hägglund, 1995). As for the GA optimization method, it is considered as a useful optimization method employing the principles of natural genetic systems (Chebli et al, 2017a;Goldberg & Holland, 1988) to seek a global solution of the optimization problem. GAs are stochastic optimization methods that sweep the entire admissible space to search the optimal solution.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several advanced algorithms for computing the dropping probability were proposed to date, see, for example [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ] and the references given there. Some propositions are based on artificial neural networks (e.g., [ 8 ]), fuzzy logic (e.g., [ 9 ]) or genetic algorithms (e.g., [ 10 ]). In others, the dropping probability is replaced by a deterministic decision about each arriving packet, i.e., whether to drop it, or not [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%