2023
DOI: 10.3390/su15119034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Objective Framework for Optimal Placement of Distributed Generations and Switches in Reconfigurable Distribution Networks: An Improved Particle Swarm Optimization Approach

Abstract: Distribution network operators and planners face a significant challenge in optimizing planning and scheduling strategies to enhance distribution network efficiency. Using improved particle swarm optimization (IPSO), this paper presents an effective method for improving distribution system performance by concurrently deploying remote-controlled sectionalized switches, distributed generation (DG), and optimal network reconfiguration. The proposed optimization problem’s main objectives are to reduce switch costs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These functions, whether single-or multi-objective, encompass technical and/or economic goals and are subject to various equality and inequality constraints. Previous studies [20,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30] have predominantly concentrated on technical objectives, encompassing power losses (both active and reactive), power system load capability, voltage deviations, voltage stability, and emissions from generating units. In contrast, other investigations [18,[31][32][33][34] have emphasized economic objectives, including fuel costs, active and reactive power costs, and the investment costs associated with optimal DGs, often overlooking technical considerations.…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These functions, whether single-or multi-objective, encompass technical and/or economic goals and are subject to various equality and inequality constraints. Previous studies [20,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30] have predominantly concentrated on technical objectives, encompassing power losses (both active and reactive), power system load capability, voltage deviations, voltage stability, and emissions from generating units. In contrast, other investigations [18,[31][32][33][34] have emphasized economic objectives, including fuel costs, active and reactive power costs, and the investment costs associated with optimal DGs, often overlooking technical considerations.…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microgrid optimization is studied in 30 , utilizing a fuzzy decision-maker and Pareto Front beam method for hourly performance optimization. The strategic placement of renewable DGs is emphasized in 31 , while 32 proposes Improved Particle Swarm Optimization to optimize distribution system performance across various objectives. These endeavors collectively contribute to the advancement of multi-objective optimization techniques for enhancing the planning and operation of distribution systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the inherent limitations of radial ADNs, network reconfiguration (NR) has been widely employed in distribution system operations. This involves changing the open and closed statuses of the sectionalizing and tie switches of the feeders [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Regardless of topology changes, the distribution networks (DNs) must be maintained in a radial type.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%