2022
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.920747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Objective Drug Design Based on Graph-Fragment Molecular Representation and Deep Evolutionary Learning

Abstract: Drug discovery is a challenging process with a huge molecular space to be explored and numerous pharmacological properties to be appropriately considered. Among various drug design protocols, fragment-based drug design is an effective way of constraining the search space and better utilizing biologically active compounds. Motivated by fragment-based drug search for a given protein target and the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) approaches in this field, this work advances the field of in silico drug d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Computational de novo drug design involves the use of techniques such as genetic algorithms, reinforcement learning, including deep reinforcement learning, generative deep learning models, or other deep learning methods, e.g., graph transformers, , models that blend deep learning and evolutionary algorithms, ,, and string-based transformers (i.e., operating on a simplified molecular-input line-entry system (SMILES) string representation of molecules). , The algorithms “computationally synthesize” novel drug molecules, either by starting from scratch and adding atoms to form a novel molecule or by modifying or adding atoms to an existing chemical structure (“scaffold”). The result is the creation of novel molecules by (a) simulating chemical modifications that optimize for the single objective of improving binding efficiency to a target or (b) multiobjective optimization including drug-likeness objectives, e.g., solubility and other drug-likeness factors. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational de novo drug design involves the use of techniques such as genetic algorithms, reinforcement learning, including deep reinforcement learning, generative deep learning models, or other deep learning methods, e.g., graph transformers, , models that blend deep learning and evolutionary algorithms, ,, and string-based transformers (i.e., operating on a simplified molecular-input line-entry system (SMILES) string representation of molecules). , The algorithms “computationally synthesize” novel drug molecules, either by starting from scratch and adding atoms to form a novel molecule or by modifying or adding atoms to an existing chemical structure (“scaffold”). The result is the creation of novel molecules by (a) simulating chemical modifications that optimize for the single objective of improving binding efficiency to a target or (b) multiobjective optimization including drug-likeness objectives, e.g., solubility and other drug-likeness factors. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, some research utilized genomic algorithms (GAs), such as Monte-Carlo Tree Search (MCTS), instead of DGM, demonstrating that GAs served as potent candidates for searching for desired chemical compounds [ 19 , 20 ]. These search-based methods generally regard molecule fragments as tree nodes, and the whole process can be viewed as searching for a feasible connection between the existing root and leaves [ 21 , 22 ]. Feasible connections not only ensure the validity of generated molecules but also make the molecular exploring process more efficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feasible connections not only ensure the validity of generated molecules but also make the molecular exploring process more efficient. However, the search process needs to get feedback from third-part supervision, which could be a scoring function, a neural network [ 22 ], or some mechanism such as expectation maximization [ 23 ]. This step requires extra training and must be devised precisely to ensure it leads the search process in the right direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, some research utilized GA (Genomic Algorithm) such as Monte-Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) instead of DGM and proved GAs served as a potent candidate for searching for the desired chemical compounds [18,19]. This search-based methods generally regard molecule fragments as the tree nodes, and the whole process can be viewed as searching for a feasible connection between the generated midbody and the nodes [20,21]. The possibility for feasible connections not only ensure the validity of generated molecules but also make the search process efficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibility for feasible connections not only ensure the validity of generated molecules but also make the search process efficient. However, the search process needs to get feedback from the thirdpart supervision, which could be a scoring function, a neural network [21], or some mechanism such as Expectation Maximization [22]. This step needs extra training and devise precisely for a reason to ensure it will lead the search process in the right direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%