2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-23868-5_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Objective Differential Evolution of Evolving Spiking Neural Networks for Classification Problems

Abstract: Spiking neural network (SNN) plays an essential role in classification problems. Although there are many models of SNN, Evolving Spiking Neural Network (ESNN) is widely used in many recent research works. Evolutionary algorithms, mainly differential evolution (DE) have been used for enhancing ESNN algorithm. However, many real-world optimization problems include several contradictory objectives. Rather than single optimization, Multi-Objective Optimization (MOO) can be utilized as a set of optimal solutions to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ESNN model demonstrates its simplicity and performance capabilities with its fast one-pass learning algorithm where no data re-training is required. However, determining a suitable parameter value is crucial for ESNN implementation, thus guaranteeing the best output [26]. A comparative study between ESNN, MLP, and SVM has been performed where ESNN achieved a better accuracy of 97.1% on the VidTimit dataset [27][28][29].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ESNN model demonstrates its simplicity and performance capabilities with its fast one-pass learning algorithm where no data re-training is required. However, determining a suitable parameter value is crucial for ESNN implementation, thus guaranteeing the best output [26]. A comparative study between ESNN, MLP, and SVM has been performed where ESNN achieved a better accuracy of 97.1% on the VidTimit dataset [27][28][29].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 shows a summary of the comparative results. Note that none of the algorithms that presented in Table XI (MEPGANf1-f3 [12], MLP-BP [13], ISO-FLANN [13], NN-CAPSO [14], NN-GSA [14], NN-ICA [14], NN-BP [15], NN-MVO [15], MODE-ESNN [16], DPM [16], SAE-MR Over all, NN-GSO algorithm is better or at least competitive for breast cancer, diabetes, heart, hepatitis, appendicitis and Alzheimer. On the other hand, NN-GSO performs comparable for the liver, disorders, thyroid and dermatology datasets (with respect to classification accuracy) comparing to other algorithms.…”
Section: B Mean Squared Error Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%