Multi-objective design optimization of antennas for reflection, size, and gain variability using kriging surrogates and generalized domain segmentation

Abstract

Cost‐efficient multi‐objective design optimization of antennas is presented. The framework exploits auxiliary data‐driven surrogates, a multi‐objective evolutionary algorithm for initial Pareto front identification, response correction techniques for design refinement, as well as generalized domain segmentation. The purpose of this last mechanism is to reduce the volume of the design space region that needs to be sampled in order to construct the surrogate model, and, consequently, limit the number of training data points required. The recently introduced segmentation concept is generalized here to allow for handling an arbitrary number of design objectives. Its operation is illustrated using an ultra‐wideband monopole optimized for best in‐band reflection, minimum gain variability, and minimum size. When compared with conventional surrogate‐based approach, segmentation leads to reduction of the initial Pareto identification cost by over 20%. Numerical results are supported by experimental validation of the selected Pareto‐optimal antenna designs.

Efficient yield estimation of multiband patch antennas by polynomial chaos‐based Kriging

“…Conventional PCE follows the standard form truncation scheme (10). The sparsity-of-effect principle 24 claims that the interaction terms do not have much effect on the PCE prediction.…”

“…Rama Sanjeeva Reddy et al 9 introduced the radial basis function neural network into design of multiple function antenna arrays and obtained a success rate as high as 98%. Koziel et al 10 constructed the fast data-fit Kriging metamodel as part of multiobjective design optimization of antennas handling arbitrary number of objective functions. Du and Roblin 11 introduced the polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) method for statistical metamodeling of the far field radiated by antennas undergoing random disturbances and validated the PCE model with a deformable canonical antenna.…”

Accelerated multiobjective design of miniaturized microwave components by means of nested kriging surrogates

“…Undoubtedly, the most popular class of surrogates are data‐driven models. The widely used techniques include kriging, Gaussian process regression, artificial neural networks, or support vector regression …”

“…54,55 Undoubtedly, the most popular class of surrogates are data-driven models. The widely used techniques include kriging, 56 Gaussian process regression, 57 artificial neural networks, 58 or support vector regression. 59 Some of the recently proposed surrogate-assisted MO frameworks 54,60,61 utilize the surrogate to yield the initial approximation of the Pareto set.…”

A Generalized SDP Multi-Objective Optimization Method for EM-Based Microwave Device Design

“…The proposed GSDP method is applied to the multi-objective optimization of a microwave device: a UWB antenna [27]. The antenna is implemented on an FR4 substrate ( ε = 4.3, h = 1.55 mm, tan δ = 0.02).…”