2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective demand side scheduling considering the operational safety of appliances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shifting ON peak demand to OFF peak period under different energy pricing schemes in a net zero energy building was achieved in [39] for measuring savings in renewable energy credits. In [40], a Pareto algorithm was applied for a multi-objective appliance scheduling considering their safe operation. Electricity cost and appliance delays were among the topics discussed in [40].…”
Section: Peak Load Shiftingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Shifting ON peak demand to OFF peak period under different energy pricing schemes in a net zero energy building was achieved in [39] for measuring savings in renewable energy credits. In [40], a Pareto algorithm was applied for a multi-objective appliance scheduling considering their safe operation. Electricity cost and appliance delays were among the topics discussed in [40].…”
Section: Peak Load Shiftingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [40], a Pareto algorithm was applied for a multi-objective appliance scheduling considering their safe operation. Electricity cost and appliance delays were among the topics discussed in [40]. Peak load shifting was achieved in [41] considering both time of use tariff and energy storage system to manage building energy demand.…”
Section: Peak Load Shiftingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To reduce the electricity cost, a Pareto-optimal front is proposed to provide scheduling decisions based on the relationship between two multi-objectives: the electricity cost and operational delay. The proposed approach is compared to the weight and constraint approaches, and the simulation results show that electricity cost is reduced and operational delay is enhanced [20].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algorithm 1 presents the optimal scheduling technique. The execution steps of the proposed optimal scheduling techniques depend on the complexity at lines (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24) in the for-loop. The complexities of other lines (i.e., 10-22) are more than these lines.…”
Section: Algorithm 1: Proposed Optimal Scheduling Technique [26]mentioning
confidence: 99%