2014
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1383771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-modal Glioblastoma Segmentation: Man versus Machine

Abstract: Background and Purpose: Reproducible segmentation of brain tumors on magnetic resonance images is an important clinical need. This study was designed to evaluate the reliability of a novel fully automated segmentation tool for brain tumor image analysis in comparison to manually defined tumor segmentations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(37 reference statements)
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our analysis, a wavelet-based quality measure [46] is used for blurriness quantification. The quality measure is defined as Q = 3 . This case however, holds the highest level of blurriness, approximately 4-6 times higher than the average blurriness of DataSet1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our analysis, a wavelet-based quality measure [46] is used for blurriness quantification. The quality measure is defined as Q = 3 . This case however, holds the highest level of blurriness, approximately 4-6 times higher than the average blurriness of DataSet1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clinical practice, expert radiologists obtain complete information about the brain tumor by multi-channel MR imaging and perform the delineation task manually. However, a non-automated segmentation process is subject to variations, not only between different radiologists but also by the same expert [3,4]. Moreover, the neoplastic tumor can vary significantly in geometric properties, location and degree of enhancement among patients, making the segmentation and characterization of brain abnormalities a very demanding, difficult and highly time consuming task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50,68 Variability in segmentation and ROI selection is another issue, which may be addressed by ever-improving automated methods of extracting imaging feature sets. 73 The use of stereotactic biopsies, rather than random sampling of the tumor, will help generate microarray analysis that is able to link gene expression data with specific imaging traits within a single tumor. 38 Physiologic imaging with perfusion, diffusion MRI, and PET scans provides a wealth of information that is only just beginning to be incorporated into these analyses.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed method was used to identify the main types of metabolic patterns seen in high‐grade gliomas (HGGs). The spatial distribution of the metabolic abnormalities was compared with the tumor segmentation performed by BraTumIA (Brain Tumor Image Analysis), which is an automatic brain tumor segmentation method trained to reproduce the manual MRI segmentation performed by experienced neuroradiologists. Besides this, we also include an analysis of two follow‐up cases where the MRSI maps are compared with the corresponding structural MRI acquired several months after, showing the ability of MRSI to predict future contrast enhancement in HGG.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%