2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-00689-1_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-modal Disease Classification in Incomplete Datasets Using Geometric Matrix Completion

Abstract: In large population-based studies and in clinical routine, tasks like disease diagnosis and progression prediction are inherently based on a rich set of multi-modal data, including imaging and other sensor data, clinical scores, phenotypes, labels and demographics. However, missing features, rater bias and inaccurate measurements are typical ailments of real-life medical datasets. Recently, it has been shown that deep learning with graph convolution neural networks (GCN) can outperform traditional machine lear… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, no single method is guaranteed to perform best on all datasets ( 30 ), which is why it is recommendable to test multiple algorithms and let their performances be compared and critically reviewed by a domain expert, instead of deciding on a single algorithm a priori. Therefore, as described in the introduction, we compare several linear, non-linear and neural-network based ML algorithms, along with a novel graph deep learning method that we recently proposed ( 6 , 12 , 13 ). Details on all classifier models and their parametrization are given in section Overview of Selected Classification Algorithms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Importantly, no single method is guaranteed to perform best on all datasets ( 30 ), which is why it is recommendable to test multiple algorithms and let their performances be compared and critically reviewed by a domain expert, instead of deciding on a single algorithm a priori. Therefore, as described in the introduction, we compare several linear, non-linear and neural-network based ML algorithms, along with a novel graph deep learning method that we recently proposed ( 6 , 12 , 13 ). Details on all classifier models and their parametrization are given in section Overview of Selected Classification Algorithms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For better transparency, several methods can and should be investigated at the same time, subject to a comparable data pre-processing and cross-validation strategy. To this end, we compare several linear, non-linear and neural-network based ML algorithms, along with a novel graph deep learning method that we recently proposed ( 6 , 12 , 13 ). Following insights from multiple classification experiments for diagnostic decision support in our research over the last few years ( 4 , 6 , 13 , 14 ), we also provide a multi-faceted analysis of algorithm outcomes, including an examination of class imbalance, multiple classification metrics, patient feature distributions, and feature importances as rated by the classifiers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We further proposed GMC [36] (denoted in the following as SingleGMC) to alleviate the common problem of missing values in medical data sets [37]. Recently, we have combined these ideas into multigraph matrix completion (MultiGMC) [38]. Here, we apply both the original SingleGMC approach [36] and MultiGMC to our data set.…”
Section: Classification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In MultiGMC, instead of taking the sum, we use them as two separate graphs. We learn separate patient representations within these two graphs (a single spectral convolutional layer per graph) and aggregate them via selfattention, before computing the classification posterior [38]. The calculation of accuracy, F1-score, and ROC-AUC is performed as for LR/RF/ANN.…”
Section: Classification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation