Multi-modal demands of a smartphone used to place calls and enter addresses during highway driving relative to two embedded systems

Abstract

There is limited research on trade-offs in demand between manual and voice interfaces of embedded and portable technologies. Mehler et al. identified differences in driving performance, visual engagement and workload between two contrasting embedded vehicle system designs (Chevrolet MyLink and Volvo Sensus). The current study extends this work by comparing these embedded systems with a smartphone (Samsung Galaxy S4). None of the voice interfaces eliminated visual demand. Relative to placing calls manually, both embedded voice interfaces resulted in less eyes-off-road time than the smartphone. Errors were most frequent when calling contacts using the smartphone. The smartphone and MyLink allowed addresses to be entered using compound voice commands resulting in shorter eyes-off-road time compared with the menu-based Sensus but with many more errors. Driving performance and physiological measures indicated increased demand when performing secondary tasks relative to ‘just driving’, but were not significantly different between the smartphone and embedded systems. Practitioner Summary: The findings show that embedded system and portable device voice interfaces place fewer visual demands on the driver than manual interfaces, but they also underscore how differences in system designs can significantly affect not only the demands placed on drivers, but also the successful completion of tasks.

Which smartphone's apps may contribute to road safety? An AHP model to evaluate experts' opinions

“…This is accomplished through: voice controls, heads up displays (HUDs) and hand gestures control. The effect of "voice-control" interface on driver behavior was investigated in numerous studies (Eriksson et al, 2014;He et al, 2013;Mehler et al, 2015;Reimer and Mehler, 2013;Reimer et al, 2015;Yager, 2013) and it seems to be concluded that voice interfaces are not necessarily free of visualmanual demands on attentional resources. Voice control includes either voice-to-text (V2T) or text-to-speech (T2S) interface.…”

Considering Self-Report in the Interpretation of Objective Performance Data in the Comparison of HMI Systems

“…In our earlier reporting Reimer et al, 2016), we raised the possibility that the higher error rates in the Chevrolet Equinox might not be due solely to the capabilities of voice recognition system and technical demands of using a one-shot input approach. For reasons detailed there, it was suggested (and later documented through sound level measurements) that road noise was higher in the Chevrolet and this might have impacted the voice system.…”

Effects of age and smartphone experience on driver behavior during address entry

“…Ninety seconds of single-task driving separated each task. At the end of each block, participants were asked to give a numeric global workload rating for the tasks they had just performed (0 low; 10 high) see [8]. Table 1.…”

“…Research has shown that different types of devices have differential draws on driver attention [7,2]. Other work investigating the modality of interactions suggests that voice interfaces may be less demanding than visual-manual equivalents [3,8].…”