2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41379-021-00807-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-magnification-based machine learning as an ancillary tool for the pathologic assessment of shaved margins for breast carcinoma lumpectomy specimens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to balance the data for binary classification since classification metrics generate reliable results only when applied to balanced datasets and produce misleading results when applied to imbalanced cases (Chicco and Jurman, 2020). However, one of the main limitations of this study is the use of only the four MFs (40×, 100×, 200× and 400×) proposed by the BreakHis dataset; there are other MFs used by pathologists for BC histopathological image diagnosis (5×, 10× and 20×) (Ho et al , 2021; D'Alfonso et al , 2021). Thus, it would be interesting to study whether the robustness of the models developed hold for different BC image datasets with different MFs.…”
Section: Threats Of Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to balance the data for binary classification since classification metrics generate reliable results only when applied to balanced datasets and produce misleading results when applied to imbalanced cases (Chicco and Jurman, 2020). However, one of the main limitations of this study is the use of only the four MFs (40×, 100×, 200× and 400×) proposed by the BreakHis dataset; there are other MFs used by pathologists for BC histopathological image diagnosis (5×, 10× and 20×) (Ho et al , 2021; D'Alfonso et al , 2021). Thus, it would be interesting to study whether the robustness of the models developed hold for different BC image datasets with different MFs.…”
Section: Threats Of Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current gold standard for margin determination is based on histopathological microscopic imaging of the tissue sections stained with H&E. A variety of optical imaging techniques have been demonstrated to enhance breast tumor margin detection in H&E slides of post-lumpectomy samples. 3 Although the techniques are capable of precise determination of tumor margins, detectable tissue types are limited due to the staining targets nuclei, connective tissue, and fat only. Also, the H&E reading requires the trained eyes of the histopathologists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 11 Similarly, another deep learning model was used as a screening tool for breast lumpectomy shaved margin assessment to save time for pathologists by excluding the majority of benign tissue samples. 12 In addition, deep learning models have been investigated to discover novel morphological patterns indicating molecular subtypes from histologic images. 13 Correlating digitized pathologic images with molecular information has contributed to prognosis prediction and personalized medicine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%