2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05642.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi‐locus species delimitation in closely related animals and fungi: one marker is not enough

Abstract: Despite taxonomy's 250-year history, the past 20 years have borne witness to remarkable advances in technology and techniques, as well as debate. DNA barcoding has generated a substantial proportion of this debate, with its proposition that a single mitochondrial sequence will consistently identify and delimit species, replacing more evidence-rich and time-intensive methods. Although mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has since been the focus of voluminous discussion and case studies, little effort has been made to com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
217
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 275 publications
(224 citation statements)
references
References 176 publications
7
217
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach is often used as an alternative to morphological and biological species recognition (Dettman et al 2003a). However, there have been relatively a few evaluations of the utility of genes to delineate closely related species in genera with broad host ranges and wide geographic distributions (Giraud et al 2008;Dupis et al 2012;Groenewald et al 2013;Wikee et al 2013;Salgado-Salazar et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is often used as an alternative to morphological and biological species recognition (Dettman et al 2003a). However, there have been relatively a few evaluations of the utility of genes to delineate closely related species in genera with broad host ranges and wide geographic distributions (Giraud et al 2008;Dupis et al 2012;Groenewald et al 2013;Wikee et al 2013;Salgado-Salazar et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the animal kingdom, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is one of the most popular markers because of its many ideal properties (Galtier et al 2009). Although mtDNA is proved to be suitable for barcoding animal life and highly informative in phylogenetic and phylogeographic studies, mtDNA patterns do not always reflect the real evolutionary history of the studied species and may be incongruent with nuclear data (Dupuis et al 2012). Low intraspecific mtDNA variation can make it impossible to reveal the phylogeography of focal groups of organisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower taxonomic level relationships have been resolved using the ITS2 of the nuclear rDNA gene cluster (Wyngaard et al 2010). Combine with mitochondrial genes and nucleic genes would produce more reliable species description than those based on a single gene (Dupuis et al 2012). One of the candidate nuclear marker is the small nuclear subunit of the ribosomal RNA ( rRNA) gene, which is a common molecular marker frequently used in phylogenetic studies ( Kruger et al 2012, Petrov et al 2014, Fonseca et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%