2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2018.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-level model predictive controller with satisfactory optimization for multi-level converters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence of non-linear loads may result in unregulated harmonic currents, which possess the capacity to induce voltage distortion at the point of common coupling (PCC). In conjunction with power quality considerations, the presence of harmonic currents generates discrepancies in power distribution and has the potential to give rise to instability issues, as shown by the performance waveforms seen in the implementation of strategies [19,20] depicted in Figure 26. The control algorithm that was developed successfully demonstrated a reduced recovery time, minimum overshoot, and lower impedance in comparison to conventional controllers by the permanent cancellation of low-frequency poles.…”
Section: Comparative Performance Evaluation Under Non-linear Loading ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The existence of non-linear loads may result in unregulated harmonic currents, which possess the capacity to induce voltage distortion at the point of common coupling (PCC). In conjunction with power quality considerations, the presence of harmonic currents generates discrepancies in power distribution and has the potential to give rise to instability issues, as shown by the performance waveforms seen in the implementation of strategies [19,20] depicted in Figure 26. The control algorithm that was developed successfully demonstrated a reduced recovery time, minimum overshoot, and lower impedance in comparison to conventional controllers by the permanent cancellation of low-frequency poles.…”
Section: Comparative Performance Evaluation Under Non-linear Loading ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This contributes to improved robustness and performance of the control system, as it can adapt to different operating conditions and disturbances. This contrasts with other control algorithms [18, 19, 30] that require a detailed mathematical model of the system. The RLS algorithm can handle non‐linearities in the system, making it a suitable method for estimating the model parameters of AFE converters with non‐linear characteristics. This is a significant advantage over linear control algorithms that cannot accurately model non‐linear systems [23, 24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This control technique is easily realized with less tuning complexity and can also include nonlinear systems and constraints easily. Moreover, the MPC directly achieves its objectives without angular calculation and reference voltage approximation methods, which reduces its implementation complexity in power electronic systems [11]. Finite set model predictive control (FS-MPC) has been achieved popularity in power electronic systems due to its simple and flexible implementation [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FS-MPC is discussed widely in the literature for controlling DC-DC and AC-DC converters [12][13][14][15], multilevel converters such as packed U-cell (PUC) [9], and flying capacitor-based ANPC hybrid converters in [16]. The FS-MPC comprises finite control actions, among which the optimal control action is attained by solving optimization problem [11]. Moreover, nonlinear control schemes, such as sliding mode control (SML) is used to control the switches of the multilevel converter and reduce the THD levels [17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%