18th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference 2017
DOI: 10.2514/6.2017-4326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Level MDO of a Long-Range Transport Aircraft Using a Distributed Analysis Framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8). The CAD interface uses the experience gained during the development of the geometry library TiGL [29], which is used for the geometry generation in the preliminary aircraft design at DLR [30][31][32]. This includes surface modeling such as section skinning or curve network interpolation, as well as the geometry export into common data formats.…”
Section: Cad Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…8). The CAD interface uses the experience gained during the development of the geometry library TiGL [29], which is used for the geometry generation in the preliminary aircraft design at DLR [30][31][32]. This includes surface modeling such as section skinning or curve network interpolation, as well as the geometry export into common data formats.…”
Section: Cad Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the help of TiGL, slight modifications of aircraft geometries can be created in an automated workflow. CPACS and TiGL are currently being developed and constantly extentended in research projects related to MDO [12][13][14]. Some ideas to increase the optimization capabilities in the future are…”
Section: Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to that point, RCE was applied mostly to assemble processes with lower-fidelity tools, such as in conceptual aircraft or spacecraft design. Moreover, the projected MDO process in Digital-X was to be a multi-level one, comprising tools and sub-processes ranging from lowfidelity, over mid-fidelity, to high-fidelity and computation-intensive [27,28,29]. It involved disciplinary expert groups from eight DLR institutes, each committed to integrating their tools and sub-process into the overall MDO process.…”
Section: Fig 8 Overview Of Parameter Variations Performed For the Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outer optimizer was the derivative-free Subplex method. More details on the setup of the MDO process, the disciplinary models and the optimization results can be found in [28,29]. Given the long effective run time of a single design analysis of about 56 hours, at the conclusion of the project the optimization was not yet fully converged.…”
Section: Fig 12 Rce Implementation Of the Digital-x Mdo Processmentioning
confidence: 99%