2018
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-18-41-2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-level emulation of a volcanic ash transport and dispersion model to quantify sensitivity to uncertain parameters

Abstract: Abstract. Following the disruption to European airspace caused by the eruption of Eyjafjallajökull in 2010 there has been a move towards producing quantitative predictions of volcanic ash concentration using volcanic ash transport and dispersion simulators. However, there is no formal framework for determining the uncertainties of these predictions and performing many simulations using these complex models is computationally expensive. In this paper a Bayesian linear emulation approach is applied to the Numeri… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of six eruption source parameters and 12 internal model parameters, Harvey et al . () found that NAME outputs are most sensitive to plume height, MER, the precipitation threshold for wet deposition, and free tropospheric turbulence. We suggest uncertainty due to the model physics is less than the uncertainty in source parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of six eruption source parameters and 12 internal model parameters, Harvey et al . () found that NAME outputs are most sensitive to plume height, MER, the precipitation threshold for wet deposition, and free tropospheric turbulence. We suggest uncertainty due to the model physics is less than the uncertainty in source parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emulators have been used in several studies to analyze complex models in multiple scientific fields including tsunami modeling (Sarri et al, 2012), aerosol and cloud modeling (e.g., Carslaw et al, 2013;Hamilton et al, 2014;Johnson et al, 2015;Lee et al, 2013;Regayre et al, 2014Regayre et al, , 2015, and galaxy formation (Rodrigues et al, 2017;Vernon et al, 2010). A recent study by Harvey et al (2018) also successfully applied this approach to volcanic ash modeling of the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption to understand the influence of eruption source parameters and internal model parameters on the simulated output.…”
Section: Emulation and Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity studies have prioritized the importance of the ESPs, indicating that plume height, MER and PSD are the key parameters when modelling the movement of volcanic ash clouds, while particle shape has a lesser but still important role [51,53,71,72]. The MER and particle characteristics are hard to measure, and it is highly unlikely that we will be provided with this information in real-time during an event.…”
Section: Improvements To Model Initializationmentioning
confidence: 99%