2022
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6501/ac6ab3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-layer adaptive convolutional neural network unsupervised domain adaptive bearing fault diagnosis method

Abstract: Deep learning provides a feasible fault diagnosis method for intelligent mechanical systems. However, this method requires a large amount of marking data, which greatly limits its application in the actual industry. Therefore, this paper proposes a multi-layer adaptive convolutional neural network unsupervised domain adaptive bearing fault diagnosis method (MACNN), which is especially suitable for bearing fault classification under variable working conditions. First, a new method to improve domain alignment is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following methods replace the objective optimization function: the objective function based on the combination of CE loss and LMMD [22], Focal Loss [38] and LMMD, Gradient Harmonizing Mechanism (GHM) [39] and LMMD. The proposed Lat-k algorithm combined with CORAL [40] and MK-MMD [41], respectively. The objective optimization function of the comparative method (CE + LMMD) is shown in equation ( 13), and the remaining four comparisons are shown individually in equations ( 19)- (22).…”
Section: Introduction Of Datasets and Comparative Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following methods replace the objective optimization function: the objective function based on the combination of CE loss and LMMD [22], Focal Loss [38] and LMMD, Gradient Harmonizing Mechanism (GHM) [39] and LMMD. The proposed Lat-k algorithm combined with CORAL [40] and MK-MMD [41], respectively. The objective optimization function of the comparative method (CE + LMMD) is shown in equation ( 13), and the remaining four comparisons are shown individually in equations ( 19)- (22).…”
Section: Introduction Of Datasets and Comparative Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yao et al [8] proposed a stacked inverse residual convolutional neural network intelligent bearing fault diagnosis method, which improved the diagnosis speed of the model and the diagnosis effect in noisy environment. Cui et al [9] presented a multi-layer adaptive convolutional neural network bearing fault method, which enhanced the feature learning ability of the model and achieved high fault diagnosis accuracy under variable working conditions. Li et al [10] put forward an improved convolutional neural network fault diagnosis method, which effectively improved the feature extraction and generalization ability of bearing fault diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang et al [17] designed a multilayer domain adaptive approach to narrow down the distribution differences of different domain features, and further achieved the transfer of laboratory bearing diagnosis models to locomotive bearings. Cui et al [18] used Log-Euclidean distance to improve domain alignment, and realized multiple fault diagnosis of gearbox bearings under variable working conditions. However, domain adaptive transfer learning is mostly applied to fault diagnosis, and rarely used to wind turbine condition monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%