2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2018.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-laboratory comparison of three commercially available Zika IgM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the NovaLisa ® ZIKV IgM ELISA, higher test specificities were reported by Basile et al . (98%, n = 155) [ 49 ] and for this study (100%, n = 120) as compared to results reported by Safronetz et al . [ 50 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…For the NovaLisa ® ZIKV IgM ELISA, higher test specificities were reported by Basile et al . (98%, n = 155) [ 49 ] and for this study (100%, n = 120) as compared to results reported by Safronetz et al . [ 50 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Fortunately, advances in flaviviral diagnostics have significantly improved accurate and timely diagnosis which can have a direct and positive effect on patient care. For instance, several ELISA and lateral flow assays are commercially available that can simultaneously detect DENV antigen, IgM and IgG antibodies (8)(9)(10)(11). This can help health care providers easily distinguish between early, primary, and secondary infections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, when ELISA assays using the NS1 protein are compared with IIF-and other laboratory results are used for the final classification of cases, such as those from PCR or PRNT-the concordance, sensitivity and specificity values of the first assay are 81.1%, 65.9% and 100%, with IIF being 86.0%, 96.8% and 72.5%, respectively, which represents a substantial improvement in specificity [11]. Assays with the NS1 protein show greater specificity than those obtained using other virus proteins such as E/prM recombinant protein, although sensitivity may be affected [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%