2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2014.06.009
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Investigator Letter on Reproducibility of Neonatal Heart Regeneration following Apical Resection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
39
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(9 reference statements)
2
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, a recent report has raised questions and discussion regarding the regenerative capacity of neonatal mouse hearts after ventricular resection (Andersen et al, 2014a; Andersen et al, 2014b; Sadek et al, 2014). Based on our results, the discrepancy might be partially explained by differences in the severities of the injuries created.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, a recent report has raised questions and discussion regarding the regenerative capacity of neonatal mouse hearts after ventricular resection (Andersen et al, 2014a; Andersen et al, 2014b; Sadek et al, 2014). Based on our results, the discrepancy might be partially explained by differences in the severities of the injuries created.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…within trabecular or cortical bone) could have an additional impact on their in vivo composition [5052]. To assess potential differences in MSCs selected from BM aspirates, FHs and RIA, we investigated the relative expression of two additional markers that have been suggested to offer highly specific selection for MSCs in BM, MSCA-1 and SUSD2 [38,39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, differences in the capacity for complete regeneration of neonatal mouse hearts after apical resection have been reported by different laboratories [8287]. Andersen et al showed that apically resected myocardium is not regenerated, despite claims of similar amounts of tissue (or less) removed (~8.5% versus ~15% in Porrello et al).…”
Section: Regenerative Responses To Different Severities Of Injuriesmentioning
confidence: 99%