2014
DOI: 10.1118/1.4866215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi‐institutional dosimetric and geometric commissioning of image‐guided small animal irradiators

Abstract: With the exception of the half-value layer, and mechanical properties, there were significant differences between the dosimetric and geometric properties of the three systems. This underscores the need for careful commissioning of each individual system for use in radiobiological experiments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
44
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For machine commissioning or yearly QA assessments, however, it is recommended to use one of the more comprehensive protocols available in the literature, which include depth dose curves and lateral dose profiles. (Tryggestad et al 2009, Clarkson et al 2011, Pidikiti et al 2011, Lindsay et al 2014)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For machine commissioning or yearly QA assessments, however, it is recommended to use one of the more comprehensive protocols available in the literature, which include depth dose curves and lateral dose profiles. (Tryggestad et al 2009, Clarkson et al 2011, Pidikiti et al 2011, Lindsay et al 2014)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some comprehensive protocols have been published to ensure accurate commissioning and dosimetric characterization as well as calibration of the beam alignment. (Matinfar et al 2009, Rodriguez et al 2009, Tryggestad et al 2009, Pidikiti et al 2011, Lindsay et al 2014) These procedures, although comprehensive, are quite time consuming and are more appropriate for machine commissioning and annual system checks, rather than ongoing monthly or weekly QA. A recent paper presented an elegant solution for everyday QA measures using a mouse-sized metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) phantom capable of measuring daily output consistency, beam energy, cone profiles and some simple image quality measures such as noise and uniformity, although no assessment for materials of varying x-ray density was included.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal irradiators have less guidance for the frequency and type of QA performed, with the result that delivery of radiation may not be as accurate as reported. 37 With the advent of partial irradiation techniques for animal models, targeting also becomes a necessary part of QA but is not standardized, leaving each laboratory to determine what level of testing is sufficient for the experiment at hand.…”
Section: Contribution Of Radiation Technique To Model Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Microirradiators enable exploration of the efficacy of novel radiation treatment approaches by providing the capability to reproduce realistic treatment delivery in small animal models. [2][3][4][5][6][7] Investigation of the efficacy and biological radio-response from new radiation treatments rely on the use of these small animal models before reaching the clinic. Preclinical studies aim to highlight the biological mechanisms governing radiotherapy response in many radiation applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%