2020
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.4630
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-institutional Analysis of Prognostic Factors and Outcomes After Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy to the Resection Cavity in Patients With Brain Metastases

Abstract: IMPORTANCEFor brain metastases, the combination of neurosurgical resection and postoperative hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) is an emerging therapeutic approach preferred to the prior practice of postoperative whole-brain radiotherapy. However, mature large-scale outcome data are lacking.OBJECTIVE To evaluate outcomes and prognostic factors after HSRT to the resection cavity in patients with brain metastases.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS An international, multi-institutional cohort study … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
59
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
7
59
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies estimate the risk of LMD following SRS alone to be 5–6.2% [ 40 , 41 , 42 ]. Modern series examining rates of 1-year LMD with post-operative SRS estimate the rate to be 7.2–30% with the large heterogeneity potentially due to the variable definitions of LMD versus focal dural recurrence within the resection cavity [ 11 , 15 , 43 , 44 , 57 ]. LMD following resection is thought to be due to an increased risk of tumor spillage into the CSF at the time of surgery, which was not clinically relevant previously when post-operative WBRT was routinely used and potentially sterilized the intracranial CSF [ 46 ].…”
Section: Optimal Approach For Utilizing Surgery and Srsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These studies estimate the risk of LMD following SRS alone to be 5–6.2% [ 40 , 41 , 42 ]. Modern series examining rates of 1-year LMD with post-operative SRS estimate the rate to be 7.2–30% with the large heterogeneity potentially due to the variable definitions of LMD versus focal dural recurrence within the resection cavity [ 11 , 15 , 43 , 44 , 57 ]. LMD following resection is thought to be due to an increased risk of tumor spillage into the CSF at the time of surgery, which was not clinically relevant previously when post-operative WBRT was routinely used and potentially sterilized the intracranial CSF [ 46 ].…”
Section: Optimal Approach For Utilizing Surgery and Srsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the reduced dose regimen delivered pre-operatively is considered sub-therapeutic for definitive treatment, the current consensus recommendation is for surveillance and consideration of re-irradiation as a last resort for continued progression [ 37 ]. Nonetheless, cases of subtotal resection are difficult clinical scenarios with worse outcomes compared to GTR regardless of whether pre-operative or post-operative SRS is chosen [ 35 , 57 ].…”
Section: Optimal Approach For Utilizing Surgery and Srsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations