2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-39575-9_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-instance Learning for Structure-Activity Modeling for Molecular Properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26 Recently, we demonstrated the applicability of unsupervised 27 and supervised clustering-based MI approaches to bioactivity predictions on several data sets. 28 However, a proper comparison of MI learning approaches to conventional ones has not been made so far.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…26 Recently, we demonstrated the applicability of unsupervised 27 and supervised clustering-based MI approaches to bioactivity predictions on several data sets. 28 However, a proper comparison of MI learning approaches to conventional ones has not been made so far.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few studies with the application of MI learning to predict the bioactivity of the compounds have been published so far in mathematics and bioinformatics journals. , Moreover, recently proposed deep learning-based multi-instance approaches have not been used in the chemistry domain except in our recent work . Recently, we demonstrated the applicability of unsupervised and supervised clustering-based MI approaches to bioactivity predictions on several data sets . However, a proper comparison of MI learning approaches to conventional ones has not been made so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it was outperformed by conventional 2D models in a larger scale testing on 163 datasets extracted from ChEMBL which contained preferably achiral molecules: 2D models were better in 124 cases, whereas in other cases both models demonstrated accuracy close to random. Afterward, we extended our studies 17,18 and performed a large-scale benchmark of single-instance and multiinstance regression models for the prediction of the biological activity of molecules on an updated 175 datasets from the ChEMBL database. 3D multi-conformation models outperformed 3D single-conformation models in 98% of cases (average R 2 = 0.524 vs. 0.024) and conventional 2D models in 70% of cases 17 (average R 2 = 0.524 vs. 0.464).…”
Section: Multi-instance Learning Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterward, we extended our studies 17,18 and performed a large‐scale benchmark of single‐instance and multi‐instance regression models for the prediction of the biological activity of molecules on an updated 175 datasets from the ChEMBL database. 3D multi‐conformation models outperformed 3D single‐conformation models in 98% of cases (average R 2 = 0.524 vs. 0.024) and conventional 2D models in 70% of cases 17 (average R 2 = 0.524 vs. 0.464).…”
Section: Multi‐instance Learning Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation