2002
DOI: 10.2322/tjsass.45.195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Instability Analysis of Swept-Wing Boundary Layers Part 1. A Nonparallel Model of Stability Equations

Abstract: Small disturbances superimposed on the growing boundary-layer flow along a long swept wing are governed by partial differential equations with respect to the local chordwise Reynolds number and the nondimensional vertical coordinate. For a simple and widely applicable method of stability estimation, however, it is desirable to reduce the exact disturbance equations to an eigenvalue problem of the corresponding ordinary differential equations, as in the stability analysis of two-dimensional parallel flows. This… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Slightly different neutral curves will be obtained from different theoretical models. In fact, the new model equation 8 predicts a lower critical value of C-F instability than that of S-C instability, in contrast to the theoretical prediction explained earlier. The other possibility for the inconsistency with the theoretical prediction is that initial amplitudes created near the source point are not the same for all wave-number components.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…Slightly different neutral curves will be obtained from different theoretical models. In fact, the new model equation 8 predicts a lower critical value of C-F instability than that of S-C instability, in contrast to the theoretical prediction explained earlier. The other possibility for the inconsistency with the theoretical prediction is that initial amplitudes created near the source point are not the same for all wave-number components.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…It should be recalled here that the familiar G ortler equations based on the parallel-ow assumption gave an unreasonal critical point located at inÿnitesimally small value of ÿ. In contrast, we can expect that the neutral curve obtained from the present equation system possesses a critical point at a ÿnite value of ÿ and its left-hand branch goes up to inÿnity as ÿ tends to zero, because the disturbance equations (4.3) include all terms of the model equations given by Itoh (1995), who added only the nonparallel term W to the G ortler equations and thereby succeeded in getting a neutral curve of the expected shape. Putting Ä = G 2 in Eqs.…”
Section: Eigenvalue Problemmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The natural deduction that ÿ 2 G 2 will approach a nonzero constant as ÿ decreases to zero indicates sharp rising of G along a hyperbolic asymptote of our neutral curve as ÿ → 0. This fact suggests the presence of a critical point within a ÿnite range of the spanwise wavenumber, unlike the parallel-ow case of G ortler's eigenvalue problem, whose dependence on G through the term ÿ 2 G 2 is destroyed in the boundary conditions at the limit of small ÿ, as discussed in more detail by Itoh (1995).…”
Section: Eigenvalue Problemmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The experimental results show good agreement with Itoh's prediction (Itoh 1996a) using linear stability theory for swept Hiemenz flow but not with the solution of the improved model equation (Itoh and Atobe 2002) which takes into account the variation of the Falkner-Skan-Cooke parameter, m, and the wall curvature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The dotted line is the theoretical result (Itoh 1996a) for swept Hiemenz flow modeled by an equation composed of the Orr-Sommerfeld (O-S) equation plus additional terms relating to the non-parallelism and curvature of the external streamline. The broken line (Itoh and Atobe 2002) is the solution for the yawed cylinder boundary layer using a recently improved model equation which takes into account the variation of the F-S-C parameter, m, and the wall curvature. The difference between these theoretical results becomes larger as the attachment line is approached, that is smaller values of 1/γ .…”
Section: Critical Frequency and Critical Wavenumbermentioning
confidence: 99%