2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12917-019-2030-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-host disease management: the why and the how to include wildlife

Abstract: In recent years, outbreaks caused by multi-host pathogens (MHP) have posed a serious challenge to public and animal health authorities. The frequent implication of wildlife in such disease systems and a lack of guidelines for mitigating these diseases within wild animal populations partially explain why the outbreaks are particularly challenging. To face these challenges, the French Ministry of Agriculture launched a multi-disciplinary group of experts that set out to discuss the main wildlife specific concept… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inherent difficulties of wildlife health research in remote areas, in combination with the lack of reports on marsh deer health parameters in Argentinian populations, emphasize the importance of opportunistic sampling, as it allows to increase the number, distribution, and variety of samples that can be submitted to a surveillance system. We developed a participatory surveillance network [26] of marsh deer morbidity and mortality in Argentina that not only allowed us to collect essential information to understand future epidemiological scenarios, but also to train participants in early detection of wildlife disease [25,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inherent difficulties of wildlife health research in remote areas, in combination with the lack of reports on marsh deer health parameters in Argentinian populations, emphasize the importance of opportunistic sampling, as it allows to increase the number, distribution, and variety of samples that can be submitted to a surveillance system. We developed a participatory surveillance network [26] of marsh deer morbidity and mortality in Argentina that not only allowed us to collect essential information to understand future epidemiological scenarios, but also to train participants in early detection of wildlife disease [25,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All five data sources converged towards similar trends, complementing and overlapping each other, both geographically and in time. Improvement of wildlife disease surveillance has progressively delivered better information, demonstrating the relevance of wildlife health surveillance programmes to produce reliable information on wildlife disease epidemiology, which allows informed management decisions [105, 106].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the Arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus) variant of rabies was eradicated in eastern Ontario, Canada, following delivery of an oral rabies vaccine [15]. In contrast, some diseases are difficult to eradicate [16]. It is currently not possible to eliminate the devastating amphibian pathogen, chytrid fungus (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis), due to environmental reservoirs and multiple host species sustaining the pathogen within the environment [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%