2020 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icme46284.2020.9102759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Hierarchical Independent Correlation Filters For Visual Tracking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EAO score of the proposed Anti-occlusion-SiamRPN is 0.404, which is significantly higher than the peer trackers and outperforms the baseline (SiamRPN++) by 1.1. Anti-occlusion-SiamRPN tracker is also compared with all the 73 trackers on VOT2018, as shown in Fig.11, our tracker ranked sixth, which also achieves good performance on VOT2018, Table 3 reports the details of the comparison with LADCF [48], MFT [49], DaSiamRPN [38], UPDT [50], RCO [51], DRT [52], SiamRPN++ [1], DeepSTRCF [51], and CPT [51] on VOT2018. The EAO score of the proposed Antiocclusion-SiamRPN is 0.364, which is significantly outperforms the baseline (SiamRPN++) by 1.2.…”
Section: ) Experiments On Otb Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EAO score of the proposed Anti-occlusion-SiamRPN is 0.404, which is significantly higher than the peer trackers and outperforms the baseline (SiamRPN++) by 1.1. Anti-occlusion-SiamRPN tracker is also compared with all the 73 trackers on VOT2018, as shown in Fig.11, our tracker ranked sixth, which also achieves good performance on VOT2018, Table 3 reports the details of the comparison with LADCF [48], MFT [49], DaSiamRPN [38], UPDT [50], RCO [51], DRT [52], SiamRPN++ [1], DeepSTRCF [51], and CPT [51] on VOT2018. The EAO score of the proposed Antiocclusion-SiamRPN is 0.364, which is significantly outperforms the baseline (SiamRPN++) by 1.2.…”
Section: ) Experiments On Otb Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some approaches improve the trackers by leveraging some stronger features extracted from neural network for a richer representation of the tracking target. As we know, CNN feature is more powerful for tracking task comparing to traditional handcraft features such as HOG [23], SIFI and CN [24,25]. So many trackers follow the idea that combines deep features with correlation filters like C-COT [22], ECO [26] and CF2.…”
Section: Related Tracking Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy is about 1.3% short of the baseline, but also higher than any other state-of-the-art. The robustness is 1.1% higher than the baseline, but unfortunately still lower than the VOT-2018 [ 9 ] challenge winner MFT [ 39 ], mostly because the latter is armed with Multi-hierarchical independent correlation filters, a close technology to our algorithm. Notice that we outperform it in the rest of the metrics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Siamese–based results—We present results from evaluating the proposed algorithm with respect to VOT-2018 [ 9 ] and LaSOT [ 21 ] benchmarks. First, we start from VOT-2018 [ 9 ] and test our tracker SNS-CF against 7 state-of-the-art methods containing either correlation filters or Siamese networks or both [ 2 , 6 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 ]. We follow its evaluation protocol and present results in the following Table 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%