IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-73947-2_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Grounded Action Research in Method Engineering: The MMC Case

Abstract: There appears to be two schools of information systems development methods research that largely pursue their own agendas without many cross-references, On the one hand there is the method engineering research and on the other hand there is the method-in-action research, There seems to be much to be gained from integrating these two schools, developing knowledge that both has the formality (rigor) and reflects its enactment in practice, To achieve this, the research approach adopted has to embrace this duality… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several such studies are mentioned and described in Cronholm (2010, 2018) and Goldkuhl and Lind (2010). Karlsson and Ågerfalk (2007) have applied a multi-grounded approach in AR studies on IS development method configuration. They applied multi-grounding principles together with the process model of Canonical Action Research (Susman and Evered 1978).…”
Section: Multi-grounding Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several such studies are mentioned and described in Cronholm (2010, 2018) and Goldkuhl and Lind (2010). Karlsson and Ågerfalk (2007) have applied a multi-grounded approach in AR studies on IS development method configuration. They applied multi-grounding principles together with the process model of Canonical Action Research (Susman and Evered 1978).…”
Section: Multi-grounding Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%