2013
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2013.2245129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Field-of-View Framework for Distinguishing Tumor Grade in ER+ Breast Cancer From Entire Histopathology Slides

Abstract: Modified Bloom–Richardson (mBR) grading is known to have prognostic value in breast cancer (BCa), yet its use in clinical practice has been limited by intra- and interobserver variability. The development of a computerized system to distinguish mBR grade from entire estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) BCa histopathology slides will help clinicians identify grading discrepancies and improve overall confidence in the diagnostic result. In this paper, we isolate salient image features characterizing tumor morphology… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
114
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
114
0
Order By: Relevance
“…69 Texture features could describe the variation in chromatin distribution, which is generally more heterogeneous in higher grade BC cells. 89 And nuclear densitometric features were significantly associated with nuclear grading. 90 In addition, the spatial arrangement of cell nuclei is important in distinguishing between differentiation degrees.…”
Section: Quantify Epithelial Features On Prognosismentioning
confidence: 92%
“…69 Texture features could describe the variation in chromatin distribution, which is generally more heterogeneous in higher grade BC cells. 89 And nuclear densitometric features were significantly associated with nuclear grading. 90 In addition, the spatial arrangement of cell nuclei is important in distinguishing between differentiation degrees.…”
Section: Quantify Epithelial Features On Prognosismentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Histopathological image analysis research tackles many problems related to diagnosis of the disease, including nucleus detection [3][4][5][6][7], prediction of clinical variables (diagnosis [8][9][10][11][12], grade [13][14][15][16][17][18], survival time [19][20][21]), identification of genetic factors controlling tumor morphology (gene expression [20,22], molecular subtypes [20,23]), and localization of ROIs [24][25][26][27][28]. One of the major research directions in histopathological image analysis is to develop image features for different problems and image types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the major research directions in histopathological image analysis is to develop image features for different problems and image types. Commonly used image features include low-level features (color [9,10,15,16,18,21,[27][28][29][30][31], texture [10-14, 18, 28]), object level features (shape [32][33][34][35][36][37], topology [8,11,14,18,26,31]), and semantic features (statistics [19,26], histograms [28,32], bag-of-words [28]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained breast cancer sections, mitoses are discernible as hyperchromatic objects with dark color that lack clear nuclear membranes and have irregularity shape properties. In fact, mitosis is a complex process during which a cell nucleus undergoes four phase and exhibits highly variable appearance, moreover in most stages a mitotic nucleus looks like a non-mitotic nucleus shown in Fig.1 [2]. Therefore, the identification of mitosis may often suffer from disagreement between inter-observers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%