AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum 2019
DOI: 10.2514/6.2019-3236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-fidelity efficient global optimization: Methodology and application to airfoil shape design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, however, either the LF or the HF model can be used for the infill. In the following calculations, we adopt the strategy of [42]: for the infill, priority is given to the less expensive LF model, and the HF one is used only when improvement achieved with the lower level of fidelity is below a given tolerance, tol = 10 −4 in the present calculations. Either way, re-sampling at the same location is avoided.…”
Section: Multi-fidelity Methods For Rdomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, however, either the LF or the HF model can be used for the infill. In the following calculations, we adopt the strategy of [42]: for the infill, priority is given to the less expensive LF model, and the HF one is used only when improvement achieved with the lower level of fidelity is below a given tolerance, tol = 10 −4 in the present calculations. Either way, re-sampling at the same location is avoided.…”
Section: Multi-fidelity Methods For Rdomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple approach consists of linking the HF and the LF models by means of an additive correlation [41]: given an LF model f LF (ξ) and an HF model f HF (ξ), it is assumed that f HF (ξ) = f LF (ξ) + δ(ξ) where δ(ξ) is an error function to be estimated. This approach is accurate enough when HF and LF models have similar scales and a good correlation, as is the case for coarse-grid approximations [42]. As an alternative, a multiplicative correlation can be used [43][44][45]: f HF (ξ) = ρ(ξ) f LF (ξ), with ρ(ξ) a constant scalar multiplier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A body of literature proposes computational methods for multifidelity Bayesian optimization applied to aerospace design problems. Among that, Meliani et al (2019) developed a multifidelity Bayesian framework to increase the efficiency of optimization problems subjected to the curse of dimensionality, and demonstrate it for the optimization of a subsonic airfoil. Mondal et al (2019) implemented a multifidelity Bayesian strategy for the optimization of a transonic compressor rotor, where a reduced number of costly high-fidelity CFD evaluations are used to enrich a lowfidelity aerodynamic surrogate.…”
Section: Domain-aware Multifidelity Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the noisy observations directly propagate from level 2 to level 3, and the terminal estimation sees the noise of level 2 in the N-MF-method. The NN-MF-method uses instead observation residuals based on the mean prediction at the previous level, see (18). Substituting Y (l) ) smooths-out most of the noise in the observations of level 2 and limits its propagation to subsequent levels.…”
Section: Noisy Estimationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the problem of applying EGO to airfoil shape optimization in a multi-fidelity framework was considered in [18]. Nested datasets are used to build MF-surrogates, and the Expected Improvement merit function is computed on the highest fidelity level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%