2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.tice.2021.101701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-features extraction based on deep learning for skin lesion classification

Abstract: For various forms of skin lesion, many different feature extraction methods have been investigated so far. Indeed, feature extraction is a crucial step in machine learning processes. In general, we can distinct handcrafted and deep learning features. In this paper, we investigate the efficiency of using 17 commonly pre-trained convolutional neural networks (CNN) architectures as feature extractors and of 24 machine learning classifiers to evaluate the classification of skin lesions from two different datasets:… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a number of scholars have also used deep learning with machine learning to achieve good skin classification results. In Benyahia et al's study, 29 they used 17 CNN architectures as feature extractors and 24 machine learning classifiers to evaluate the efficiency of skin lesion classification from two different datasets, ISIC 2019 and PH2. Through the experiments, for the ISIC 2019 dataset, DenseNet 201 combined with Fine KNN or Cubic SVM has the highest accuracy (92.34% and 91.71%).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a number of scholars have also used deep learning with machine learning to achieve good skin classification results. In Benyahia et al's study, 29 they used 17 CNN architectures as feature extractors and 24 machine learning classifiers to evaluate the efficiency of skin lesion classification from two different datasets, ISIC 2019 and PH2. Through the experiments, for the ISIC 2019 dataset, DenseNet 201 combined with Fine KNN or Cubic SVM has the highest accuracy (92.34% and 91.71%).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the output results are concatenated and forwarded to the next convolutional layer. Inception units produce multilevel feature extraction with optimized variants and avoid patch alignment problems 60 , 61 . They also reduce the number of network parameters.…”
Section: Using Cgan In Fine-tuning Transfer Learning Models For Few-s...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors tried to obtain the mid-level features by studying the relationships among different images based on distance metric learning and gave as an input to the classifiers instead of using the extracted features directly. A study on understanding the efficiency of 17 commonly pre-trained CNN models used for feature extraction was carried out by Samia Benyahia et al [ 38 ]. It has been observed that DenseNet201 along with k -nearest neighbor and support sector machine (SVM) outperformed with respect to classification accuracy for the ISIC 2019 dataset.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%